Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Thu, 20 September 2018 21:40 UTC
Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B83BA130E41 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 14:40:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zqetia6jQIjW for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 14:40:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw1-xc2b.google.com (mail-yw1-xc2b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27D15127333 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 14:40:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw1-xc2b.google.com with SMTP id y80-v6so10245ywd.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 14:40:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=E4MxKRiIVV+yLYFh5RtBgg3GI0Bb9B3EyQDt7NkypY8=; b=yIMgKTLyBHNziIKIBpulCjCsw/tjxuqmW1XWZrz2kx3UJHLSvRMw+VMp7sKiWUY7xn HrQ3c44PLc0CRMXTqi/TdLHNfUlLlOo/Yb32zfOheYjkxBlOMFmRzxsF9WxIGfX72pdt VhsopudO7VD8J8bNzC7D0SRGm/joRRSGUHFW063E1FZH4hUyXWsjH/vySetAmZD19Z0L m6cVNgFZ8OXpztGzSQrHavPg+O6G4ho3v69QLkIVfwjKTFllLZFU+dANW77WeAAxSBEH GM3pDKkJp2oEseXikOsRl1yEXw2G/tYpZL7tnC75yZlCmkJLbWeGcyGSiAQYiJZoMDaU Myzg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=E4MxKRiIVV+yLYFh5RtBgg3GI0Bb9B3EyQDt7NkypY8=; b=hcTAPVC+EiXINY+9SLEo634sTD5XDTzsbUfX4geMQbBt1Ms93xlzN9G+ly5429bDQW K0iOW45/og1/0picIk8TOywmovhR4BEmPmL5aUviX2yl6Q+EBzxusTBMzXrVLYIXsNcC 9b/A88iuUMuBQxmnnPUpTgHverBJxGsFpkxqIho/jrob16HNrqJYzxOdS41a36ouEGEA AdEe6ZNr7J3hMmKew/TV/byWc0nPif+sE/8URfFjktGRNfIDlreFEmX88HaP8t8ZrDt3 EhYZrHYY+Lf1Ru/CRvkkYrnuCvpPh+0WbChJIPATtlTclelYM/7mMwOL6C/wlkHWjuc9 hvlQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51AO8MOa3m/DjifPCoddyyh78SO78VmWbyDWgntmyCEkRat21kxZ 0qW97/P+S7P5PRmKXmTC6cJCEw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdbvNob2UiMA2VzhqNjIwG6sQImVtpL2GuPmo1sSBbyVTnOCj6Xem5KPt4K7NBSMy0W7K0EHfw==
X-Received: by 2002:a81:4a87:: with SMTP id x129-v6mr2891400ywa.103.1537479601315; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 14:40:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.100.12] (c-73-167-89-221.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [73.167.89.221]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n187-v6sm12351721ywn.76.2018.09.20.14.40.00 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 20 Sep 2018 14:40:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <B40D702B-CD2D-42F0-91D5-D7B2776C2A2F@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_85F2FD1E-4ECF-48E1-9E45-11EA3FBDE590"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.0 \(3445.100.39\))
Subject: Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 17:39:58 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20180920201136.dtdw3dcjw663byu4@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Cc: Evan Hunt <each@isc.org>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, ietf@ietf.org
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
References: <cafa1282-ae6a-93de-ea4a-d100af28d8b8@digitaldissidents.org> <20180920132601.uwv2lblcvr4ojtk5@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CAHbuEH7jeGLBMH8Yi+_o+o-NvZKmWt4KbtwbP-8XtL0taUCx_Q@mail.gmail.com> <20180920143103.lvg6rmkzqfyjq3fr@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <52399791-9285-bcab-4fcd-3eb0f0a1f64f@gmail.com> <20180920151907.5wxxlccrvcgzjzcz@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <0FE3D4B6-CDDC-40A5-AC84-9C9E24278919@vpnc.org> <20180920171706.vemkprtgq2potrkr@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <20180920185721.GD68853@isc.org> <20180920201136.dtdw3dcjw663byu4@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.100.39)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/2A_RdKmgO0z1gM_rSNYSjB8Zm_U>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 21:40:05 -0000
On Sep 20, 2018, at 4:11 PM, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote: > Do i qualify to demand a rename of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fat_tree <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fat_tree> > if i have an appropriate BMI and feel offended or do i have to work in > a Data Center ? Toerless, let me put it to you this way: are you having a problem at work that is sufficient that you feel that you would like to report it to your human resources/personnel department as harassment, but you don't feel safe in doing so? If so, and if what you are experiencing is being enabled by some terminology used in the IETF, then what you are saying would apply. Otherwise you are just wasting our time asking this question. This is not a Kaffee Klatsch, and we are not talking about this for fun. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hostile_work_environment <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hostile_work_environment>
- Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Niels ten Oever
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Riccardo Bernardini
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Stewart Bryant
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Petr Špaček
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Niels ten Oever
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Dave Cridland
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Loa Andersson
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Mukund Sivaraman
- SV: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Anne-Marie Eklund-Löwinder
- RE: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Roberta Maglione (robmgl)
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Ole Troan
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Michal Krsek
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Tony Finch
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Job Snijders
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Anton Ivanov
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Anton Ivanov
- RE: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Adrian Farrel
- Re: SV: Diversity and offensive terminology in RF… Jaap Akkerhuis
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Toerless Eckert
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs lloyd.wood
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Carsten Bormann
- Re: SV: Diversity and offensive terminology in RF… lloyd.wood
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Paul Wouters
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Paul Wouters
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs lloyd.wood
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Toerless Eckert
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Stephan Wenger
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Mark Nottingham
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Stephen Farrell
- RE: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs John E Drake
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Melinda Shore
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Dick Franks
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs ned+ietf
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Toerless Eckert
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Melinda Shore
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Melinda Shore
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Paul Hoffman
- Re: SV: Diversity and offensive terminology in RF… Evan Hunt
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Toerless Eckert
- ""Man-in-the-middle""? <was, Re: SV: Diversity an… Charlie Perkins
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Evan Hunt
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Melinda Shore
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Evan Hunt
- Re: SV: Diversity and offensive terminology in RF… Michael StJohns
- Re: ""Man-in-the-middle""? <was, Re: SV: Diversit… Dave Aronson
- Re: SV: Diversity and offensive terminology in RF… Heather Flanagan
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Mark Nottingham
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Heather Flanagan
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Evan Hunt
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Carsten Bormann
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Ted Lemon
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Toerless Eckert
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Evan Hunt
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Carsten Bormann
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs John C Klensin
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Carsten Bormann
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Toerless Eckert
- Re: SV: Diversity and offensive terminology in RF… Anton Ivanov
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Yoav Nir
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Kyle Rose
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Carsten Bormann
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Dave Cridland
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Ted Lemon
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and of… John Levine
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Toerless Eckert
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Ted Lemon
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Mark Rousell
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and of… Mark Rousell
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and of… Melinda Shore
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Alia Atlas
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and of… Allison Mankin
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Mark Rousell
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Mark Rousell
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Mark Rousell
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Lloyd Wood
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Lloyd Wood
- On-path attackers (Was: Re: Diversity and offensi… Jari Arkko
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and of… Eliot Lear
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and of… Niels ten Oever
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and of… Lloyd Wood
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Eliot Lear
- Re: On-path attackers (Was: Re: Diversity and off… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Alissa Cooper
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and of… Paul Wouters
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and of… Ted Lemon
- Re: On-path attackers (Was: Re: Diversity and off… Donald Eastlake
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and of… Lloyd Wood
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Niels ten Oever
- Re: On-path attackers (Was: Re: Diversity and off… Toerless Eckert
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Ted Lemon
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Anton Ivanov
- Re: On-path attackers (Was: Re: Diversity and off… Ted Lemon
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and of… John R Levine
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Paul Wouters
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Eliot Lear
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Toerless Eckert
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Nico Williams
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and of… Avri
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Dave Cridland
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and of… John Levine
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and of… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and of… Allison Mankin
- Tell me if I should send this Re: why exactly is … Mallory Knodel
- Mallory-in-the-middle attacks (Re: SV: Diversity … Nico Williams
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Nico Williams
- Re: On-path attackers (Was: Re: Diversity and off… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Glenn Deen
- Re: Mallory-in-the-middle attacks (Re: SV: Divers… Nico Williams
- Re: Tell me if I should send this Re: why exactly… lloyd.wood
- Re: Mallory-in-the-middle attacks (Re: SV: Divers… Mallory Knodel
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and of… Mallory Knodel
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and of… S Moonesamy
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and of… Mallory Knodel