IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF Hackathon at IETF 92, March 21-22, Dallas, TX

"Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com> Thu, 26 February 2015 00:44 UTC

Return-Path: <eckelcu@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BEFD1A036A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 16:44:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Nm_iTs0dN_8p for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 16:44:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2326C1A1A33 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 16:44:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4764; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1424911466; x=1426121066; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=R1hRQcGdw4PCs780yMHk+GCe5MQcSyPSrHNSyGFzQP0=; b=ezXBfTD9bGjD8YcA8Hwcddf+mf0bhRKT0HPz4XFLsNHuGaJCAKEMejyZ lUd6ffflmg1+NruGgqfgbDAKzx7c08sqHsFFmEd7ty2n9ZE/9zTV10dax hu3Nckop7nMmKsjyOE7sqc0uHpYYHWCCANv2un+OrQpeLjxdp8/bBotfC s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AnBwAza+5U/4QNJK1bgj9DgSwEvTKLYgKBJUMBAQEBAQF8hA8BAQEEeRACAQgEDQMBAigHIREUCQgCBAENBYgbAxHQKg2FQAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAReLE4E9gQeCGREHhCsFj2OHTDOBRoEsjA2GCCKCAg0PgVBvgUR/AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,648,1418083200"; d="scan'208,217";a="396074421"
Received: from alln-core-10.cisco.com ([173.36.13.132]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 26 Feb 2015 00:44:25 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com [173.36.12.88]) by alln-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t1Q0iPYQ014167 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 26 Feb 2015 00:44:25 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x08.cisco.com ([169.254.3.45]) by xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com ([173.36.12.88]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 18:44:25 -0600
From: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com>
To: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
Subject: Re: IETF Hackathon at IETF 92, March 21-22, Dallas, TX
Thread-Topic: IETF Hackathon at IETF 92, March 21-22, Dallas, TX
Thread-Index: AQHQUFOkH7HlE1Nn2E6m2YbduHXwrZ0AmaaAgADYLwD///PXAIAAihQAgAAMnACAAAG1gIAACV+AgAAH3oD//51dgIAAh2iA//98MAAAEM/CAAABFLeAAAAwIQAAAcnqgAACz5QA//99nwCAAIaVgIAABGkAgAAAdQCAAAgcAIAABaMA//98B4A=
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 00:44:24 +0000
Message-ID: <D113AB83.3E9D6%eckelcu@cisco.com>
References: <D1136F2B.3E87C%eckelcu@cisco.com> <54EE3016.3040106@gmail.com> <DB3PR06MB219F1410E358FF8608F1340BF170@DB3PR06MB219.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com> <54EE389A.3080904@gmail.com> <FE093242-C4C9-4602-B576-50391F3B1437@lucidvision.com> <D656F2B2-E848-4444-96EB-0D67653A4A46@juniper.net> <D1139888.3E952%eckelcu@cisco.com> <D22D1246-CDFD-41ED-B08C-91D8F4401DFD@lucidvision.com> <20150225234554.GK3297@mx1.yitter.info> <216D6F3F-5028-4177-BAEF-D939492329FE@lucidvision.com> <20150226001634.GL3297@mx1.yitter.info> <CAKRbAfA-FZ-oSUmHdSDk5A=AouHxW-D+9hBytnKWVP1Kc+W26Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKRbAfA-FZ-oSUmHdSDk5A=AouHxW-D+9hBytnKWVP1Kc+W26Q@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.7.141117
x-originating-ip: [10.24.213.76]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D113AB833E9D6eckelcuciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/2BtMYQReATAMzzzknV33s4gxY1I>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 00:44:27 -0000

Hi Melinda,

I know it is short notice, but we can add another technology if you or someone else can act as a champion for it and help mentor other participants. That is all that is required. Otherwise, we can certainly add it to the list for IETF 93.

Cheers,
Charles

From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com<mailto:melinda.shore@gmail.com>>
Date: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 at 4:36 PM
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com<mailto:ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org<mailto:ietf@ietf.org>" <ietf@ietf.org<mailto:ietf@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: IETF Hackathon at IETF 92, March 21-22, Dallas, TX


On Feb 25, 2015 3:16 PM, "Andrew Sullivan" <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com<mailto:ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>> wrote:

>But complaining about one company's promotion of its products
> by suggesting an alternative company that does something extremely
> similar sounds to me like a complaint about the particular company,
> and not about the technique.

I don't think Github is the right answer here - we've got our own tools, let's use them - but I don't think the situations are comparable in that Github didn't organize the event, did not choose the subject technologies, and is not offering prizes under the IETF banner as enticements to IETF participants to work on things that aren't IETF work items but that they're trying to get picked up.  So, I don't think they're that similar.  (Did nobody really think about this?)

Melinda

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email