Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?

Brian E Carpenter <> Fri, 14 February 2020 19:07 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CDAE120B31 for <>; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 11:07:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M9LHpD0cEHun for <>; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 11:07:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::441]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 681F4120B28 for <>; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 11:07:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with SMTP id 185so5324531pfv.3 for <>; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 11:07:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=N0R1CDnTo/vtNSH5uN9MW0w4yiKKEn0CdsNuPWIhcl0=; b=mX4VLSVQ7qNEike/qSRIOzbjAa3RTL3ArXKCBbWi3PQA6fbsXoAASrqep7fa/Btvi9 32218qcJHJz0rnyPcvJCKtYGbqTd1WrdHfFK6+tZnMzRuazNLSyJbyShFa0rNV+BJCrv oWelOUzzJu/NljhT5adJwKKp9YQBeZp5UigKV6xA6+wxMlPIeS1AS/pDdPfL898K33FP OCAJN18xQ4AuxOXG/BuTHbreUeXdx35/XkiYIYfrBlPDeMR7RcYou0LOW7oh2/VQxmZG D1KZUvi8JZGv+NA5eaAiLjgG3BFAi/EKGkq/+VCdAWZpQSKASWhYCQSbjJXBVLdt8HVJ RtaA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=N0R1CDnTo/vtNSH5uN9MW0w4yiKKEn0CdsNuPWIhcl0=; b=d0tDgIhJXVoGGn+WoJVXiCBkqXVJxMzl9sUUIC6lgYNrYLk7IyHEQkHScq24w9BMGG JgXJ90DiqqI4KOIqbDQlRhdSZ3P1nOOQ/jJdxmEkMSBlBC8AU5ElyY+gldAm5lS8K8O+ ATHom5cCH5t1VgDiQdkIvI6L6QHCDWGPKO+IglQuPR0AGPoRz1ygrHyZNPlvViJQ0zCU dBCcUq1VDV9+vVnBMfW28YEVUyV2fyT2AgJ+J3+RZCjg5h2fKKxbfbysMTyYDL4k5hhE gBVk870Qvy7jlQ9+UNIm3TIunjqEXuzy9cJGZHNvXPG8EU6nYRYhKJiDSWivyNFVDW+y qXQQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVMej89hgj1XsEEb8nIS20hzPdIcaCfXg/+wq6c5xSonpFCrX8Y 9KkHyQDLY3Hh+IeTz3kUj29qsB+8
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy+wbp5YFap+E0amdYiSisl5o25LaN/EsJcKypBPOHa7tUF2AfUW8wzRk4gt6Y2t9tw1rBXMw==
X-Received: by 2002:a65:641a:: with SMTP id a26mr4971550pgv.425.1581707250348; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 11:07:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [] ([]) by with ESMTPSA id s124sm8314170pfc.57.2020. (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 14 Feb 2020 11:07:29 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
To: "Roberta Maglione (robmgl)" <>, Vittorio Bertola <>, "Belotti, Sergio (Nokia - IT/Vimercate)" <>
Cc: "" <>
References: <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <>
From: Brian E Carpenter <>
Message-ID: <>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 08:07:28 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 19:07:37 -0000


The issue on the plane is not the air supply, which is HEPA filtered, but direct contact with a carrier of the virus. There's a balanced article at

As far as I can tell, the flight will be the safest part of the week.


On 15-Feb-20 02:36, Roberta Maglione (robmgl) wrote:
> Vittorio,
> I didn't have time to watch the video that you sent.
> However what it sounds strange to me is that the same Italian virologist you mentioned, in another interview for an italian newspaper, says that a person who is already infected by the virus, but who does not show any sympton, can already infect other people. So based on that the Italian virologist  invites companies to allow people to work from home to avoid spreading the virus.
> My understanding, by this is just my opinion, is that the coronavirus creates serious risks when people move around, or  when several people are aggregated in the same place.  In case of an international meeting we need to add to that the fact of spending many hours on the plane, as somebody else already pointed out in this thread.
> Roberta
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf <> On Behalf Of Vittorio Bertola
> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2020 12:14 PM
> To: Belotti, Sergio (Nokia - IT/Vimercate) <>om>;
> Subject: RE: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
>> Il 13/02/2020 20:23 Belotti, Sergio (Nokia - IT/Vimercate) <> ha scritto:
>> It would be interesting to know which type of information you have to judge that in this case the risk is not big. I'm only an engineer not a medical doctor and I'd rather to stay cautious before to quote the level of risk.
>> Yesterday 14000 new infected in Hubei region and more than 200 deads...just for info, right now.
> To you, and to anyone else who understands Italian, I recommend watching this call with Ilaria Capua, the best known Italian virologist, currently at the University of Florida:
> It provides a much better, more informed and more rational perspective than the media.
> By the way, perhaps organizing a similar online session with a qualified scientist in the field could help people in making up their mind.