Re: #506, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-24

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Wed, 30 October 2013 21:51 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AC2211E81C9; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:51:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.523
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.523 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.924, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LsVQ4zuxrlU9; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:51:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80E9811E80F1; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:51:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.224.152.154]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r9ULolug011263 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:50:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1383169860; bh=SzsIHzfjl5wKnCjtGjoohKveXMH2e1ou1Azm/qSSB40=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=L4jI5cklLhqE05M4kqp+JPjpXODyRFZqhbdRey+cvhDqqcM1Xc9LUQ0Vv7XPX7mKe bMIF8m2hTF63LFiT7X/USI09Bvjzv7dneEiyiJwL82k+v9H7SZTu/ugqKuejYRgr9f cKzkwptPENZ1eG+Jf/j/3iixZK1cbF141AlPU0ck=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1383169860; i=@elandsys.com; bh=SzsIHzfjl5wKnCjtGjoohKveXMH2e1ou1Azm/qSSB40=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=HX91AAsE9aN41mouJYUU8/cLF4P8ZiXfNIQFhSgOlS2phVFZc+la5pvMiN5EtyasQ lLbgFinXHPXAIHAPruE6skR4Xp1bi3x/++oGMSavn0YpjExZqqvdpFB2LQx6ix04Bh 1DHXHLRI7QhKJBgvfCvRikdMsrFGXmz/UhfoQXxc=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20131030141311.0cf57b20@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:49:59 -0700
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, apps-discuss@ietf.org, draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range.all@tools.ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: #506, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-24
In-Reply-To: <5270C9DE.3000104@gmx.de>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20131028101123.0e37a698@elandnews.com> <526FD3E8.9010904@gmx.de> <6.2.5.6.2.20131029232953.0ce8cc58@elandnews.com> <5270C9DE.3000104@gmx.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 21:51:06 -0000

Hi Julian,
At 01:57 30-10-2013, Julian Reschke wrote:
>But then, we don't want the boilerplate to be in front of the 
>Introduction. Any *concrete* suggestion how to address this?

The sentence about "OPTIONAL feature" can be added to Section 3 of 
draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-24.

I would consider adding some text to the paragraph in Section 2.5 of 
draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-24 about "considered 
conformant".  This is to make it clear which features are part of basic HTTP.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy