Re: Enough DMARC whinging
"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> Wed, 30 April 2014 15:03 UTC
Return-Path: <agmalis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A779E1A08F1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 08:03:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14RKs7Phv5Ip for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 08:03:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qa0-x22e.google.com (mail-qa0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5975D1A08E8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 08:03:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id w8so1734986qac.19 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 08:03:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=IoPHOk/U/smI5Tbn9CugDcbTFuABGUOp3v7tKPwFB4I=; b=haUAuHVrCDOW8wl4CalfklUD/0hO8T7WgOIfU5Fq16wtF7SVIPLZAMabKkaPPQnJN3 PPszDi7v18Bndcdx8GY4DnJ6PZH/+Deyka2Bszj4OBF40MX//+LLlRuBJrYXm2zj9kGb pelOQ+l07W6c2JkfpmvwyEgHUEA/JpbBPTDzZyqpAN+Up51wia+egDnB3BNWOsRdQ3/f jIs0aDDtysrFxO5qwtYu0EqB3Oz8udnwCgYHNbRwS7gamNugGm8cytb9DxMpXs4w3e1J mpkFFuy3AuAv4v18howLKop0y9FNTtUvtaQnChyLMheYWyfaIaiZG6Robzfrg9STFn53 Bczw==
X-Received: by 10.224.66.4 with SMTP id l4mr6037226qai.70.1398870216551; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 08:03:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.205.69 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 08:03:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwikJhO5R6UqWx8qUswMptgTw_wF6E6_9Ok=SRYTBChYgA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMm+Lwh0Sc2wtvjEAjOMi4emDzyF4JWmmzYr5QEFcmyoKtkTAA@mail.gmail.com> <CAA=duU0i1Ppc-nMeWL-ipms4E4b0wpsSRZdLG+2YhujPgH-ZPQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+LwikJhO5R6UqWx8qUswMptgTw_wF6E6_9Ok=SRYTBChYgA@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 11:03:15 -0400
Message-ID: <CAA=duU3scwm=j2BJ6jq4k5zRQPkXOVOR1UscQqZZ8tG5HEZTwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Enough DMARC whinging
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c290585831ae04f843dadf"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/2H9bAXqRexOh7xYmZZMBQnVDZqw
Cc: IETF general list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 15:03:39 -0000
Phillip, Of course the way to make mailing lists work with DMARC would be to > look at the headers and treat messages with mailing list headers > differently. Perhaps the issue isn't in DMARC but how the information > from DMARC is applied. > >From my reading of sections 10.2, 5.2, and 15.4 of draft-kucherawy-dmarc-base-04, you can't do that and still claim receiver conformance with that draft (although there's the question of whether one should claim conformance to an informational draft in the first place). Cheers, Andy
- Enough DMARC whinging Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Andrew G. Malis
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Christian de Larrinaga
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Andrew G. Malis
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Dave Crocker
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Mitch Rodrigues
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging John C Klensin
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Andrew G. Malis
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Dave Crocker
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging John Levine
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Miles Fidelman
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Jim Fenton
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Dave Crocker
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Hector Santos
- Commenting on/ reviewing Independent Submissions … John C Klensin
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Miles Fidelman
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Mark Andrews
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Hector Santos
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Doug Barton
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Miles Fidelman
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Alessandro Vesely
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Miles Fidelman
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging t.p.
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Miles Fidelman
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Dave Crocker
- Re: Not Enough DMARC whinging John Levine
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Miles Fidelman
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Jim Fenton
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Dave Crocker
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Miles Fidelman
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Dave Cridland
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Dave Crocker
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Dave Cridland
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Murray S. Kucherawy
- Large market player S Moonesamy
- Re: Large market player Abdussalam Baryun