Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Wed, 27 January 2021 21:30 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1104F3A0B34; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 13:30:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.349
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.349 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.25, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HmfTDulj549X; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 13:30:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A948D3A0B2F; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 13:30:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122332.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 10RLARHj030842; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 21:30:20 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=J6YJRuJL0XuVp4qx5gas5Jl03NwumuDRklXUXxyZX/8=; b=B6gpdviNk0ZCQXY1sN8ARWLEDuAyqfl6YAJE9O2VuClY77cZgi8rjgjj+qG14UP9hn+I fr1+J30e8+/d3AIOp9N3cHUK4/BcwTz3eB5MrPV/+6yrFCaOUCjLLSieIi7D1w41ndBv jbGUh+t1i5NS0DEmQL6PPpsFhDxnEx9Tg+d+jFAnnAq8X8XgXPrvDxTI+QSG4xsbVNqi osLfe4XjmNLcgV2W2E8WO/GhAPOiVaBxnQ1SfLQVvVZqSwKHfx6lFHaYwJ/SgRNd+0ve zq6r6IpxdKwk9+jKPXpsF7wN8Br1j/1wuIgQ6WhMbIct8EQSoLj9NGSdqxR24DPHVsWq 0g==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint3 (a72-247-45-31.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com [72.247.45.31] (may be forged)) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 368cqxb7ry-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 27 Jan 2021 21:30:20 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 10RLIkER017839; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 16:30:19 -0500
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.115]) by prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com with ESMTP id 36b7hac76p-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 27 Jan 2021 16:30:19 -0500
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.119) by ustx2ex-dag1mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.122) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 15:30:18 -0600
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.119]) by ustx2ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.119]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.010; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 15:30:18 -0600
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood=40comcast.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections
Thread-Topic: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections
Thread-Index: AQHW8CIWn5056cBTnU6OqGJaqySJIaozcNSAgAim4AA=
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 21:30:17 +0000
Message-ID: <4DF494D7-DD4C-443B-AC71-8F6502C474C7@akamai.com>
References: <289B641E-F445-407F-9A7D-FCDEA9698F7C@akamai.com> <CC628D84-E0BE-4BE4-96BC-4F32DF34B510@cable.comcast.com>
In-Reply-To: <CC628D84-E0BE-4BE4-96BC-4F32DF34B510@cable.comcast.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.45.21011103
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.27.118.139]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <E52B593FDFD1064C81A726F717038ABF@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.343, 18.0.737 definitions=2021-01-27_07:2021-01-27, 2021-01-27 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxlogscore=999 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2101270108
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.343, 18.0.737 definitions=2021-01-27_07:2021-01-27, 2021-01-27 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 priorityscore=1501 clxscore=1015 mlxlogscore=999 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2101270108
X-Agari-Authentication-Results: mx.akamai.com; spf=${SPFResult} (sender IP is 72.247.45.31) smtp.mailfrom=rsalz@akamai.com smtp.helo=prod-mail-ppoint3
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/2NdTeGjuBRvc_poKTFfdqnJXIUk>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 21:30:22 -0000

>    Finally, my own personal perspective is that re-appointment should be largely pro forma unless there is tangible evidence of someone being a poor fit for the role or otherwise struggling or failing to do their job in the 1st term.

I understand this, and most comments and discussions I've seen mentions this.

A downside of this is that the true number of openings in any given year is half of what it appears to be as the practical term of office is chosen, and then re-chosen two years later.  I would expect that it's less than half because people who might be interested lose their enthusiasm and don't try. Further, given the job-changing frequency in our industry, it can be hard to sustain interest, and management approval, over multiple years. One place it's easier is, of course, big companies.

It's all tangled up, everything's a trade-off.  Every area has a directorate now. Can an AD job be learned in under a year?