Re: I-D Action: draft-leiba-rfc2119-update-00.txt
"C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com> Wed, 10 August 2016 14:59 UTC
Return-Path: <heard@pobox.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C04712D103 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 07:59:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.948
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.948 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com; domainkeys=pass (1024-bit key) header.from=heard@pobox.com header.d=pobox.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zh7us-vlXnHY for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 07:59:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (pb-smtp1.pobox.com [64.147.108.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4A9112D0FB for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 07:59:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC27A35788 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:59:44 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=mime-version :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; s=sasl; bh=J1OA7T dP2cDgIO97sAtuyimRObo=; b=HqBlPd1+pzOxqI/euStt907NEMU/xBkdRXUjnB hMNxd8B2KsxJ/rvB+r6WKEOQSdHyse6T0hvZ2hYS7IkYs6MaAwWZtDWLyPz6Pq3X eYP4FFDKW6iTAg2YqmTlHPmY7R4jEmEbFbK1WaKm2hzr+1OwYOyq17BnakUjhKkz Hk5kE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=mime-version :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b= HVueQgUNP195tFZAeqOdkc2gy3TiTPvUdDRHwfp4VIqGYOOxw4MUO6FWTvrqNom9 GvrFdp+NGfBL9OIj7XrUweRbdlreLgCzmKQti5cCQdG8Gc5X1ePwQZ9O/Fcfqi+2 NpwHQwZ1PjONW0kPDq0W9RKCDaKGLuRlZCan8H30/t4=
Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4CEC35787 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:59:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail-ua0-f177.google.com (unknown [209.85.217.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 737B435786 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:59:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by mail-ua0-f177.google.com with SMTP id 97so74013306uav.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 07:59:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouuWkcwwlowEjULnkw8HD8lMowNom4shgQeJsoI2w/hQS8J5BVi7xoS0ev4knVqwzbJMDCQDn+kqnMo/QQ==
X-Received: by 10.159.54.143 with SMTP id p15mr2253243uap.148.1470841184036; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 07:59:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.221.130 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 07:59:23 -0700 (PDT)
From: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 07:59:23 -0700
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CACL_3VHDjvrJKKRNKxBe9Sh6Tim-mej+py06AMXqcE2DtQPY=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CACL_3VHDjvrJKKRNKxBe9Sh6Tim-mej+py06AMXqcE2DtQPY=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-leiba-rfc2119-update-00.txt
To: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 12BA04C8-5F0B-11E6-985C-89D312518317-06080547!pb-smtp1.pobox.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/2QidYc72W8ywa22q435SJ5JkOeg>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 14:59:47 -0000
Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com> wrote: > > To reduce the number of reserved key words, the following key words > > are deprecated, and no longer have special meanings defined by BCP > > 14: > > > > REQUIRED, SHALL, SHALL NOT, RECOMMENDED, NOT RECOMMENDED, OPTIONAL > > I will be glad to see the back of SHALL, but I object to deprecating > the adjectives. They are useful - indeed, sometimes required - for > the construction of readable sentences and, for example, tables of > RECOMMENDED and OPTIONAL values. +1 to keeping the adjectives. They are indeed helpful or even necessary in crafting readable prose. Mike Heard
- Re: I-D Action: draft-leiba-rfc2119-update-00.txt C. M. Heard
- Re: I-D Action: draft-leiba-rfc2119-update-00.txt Brian E Carpenter