Re: RFC Errata junk
DJ Chase <u9000@posteo.mx> Fri, 01 April 2022 20:06 UTC
Return-Path: <u9000@posteo.mx>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FB0A3A011B
for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 13:06:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=posteo.mx
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id NrSanKB3_fit for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Fri, 1 Apr 2022 13:05:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout01.posteo.de (mout01.posteo.de [185.67.36.65])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 958AC3A0115
for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 13:05:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169])
by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83C03240027
for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 22:05:48 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.mx; s=2017;
t=1648843549; bh=CJH8sjSsVTgfKGj4rqPesRPcVd/XtyHVFxWoNTRwa3U=;
h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:From;
b=LCbk5idGtKH0aT56wZmnBYceyQFgL9uk1ztkbBtuZP1ssINP8lsCWrJg7peptzwG2
U10MEiUaabg5IRzkKgwqTFxXRXIENIHP43C/Y6uSV89QevOaPhPdvj4T4Zfkf7w2oB
qbb7XzEGHFaioQe3oMbCTlSOxdf6ORjc26Mpfzaq19aYKaLont59rOXbBFPcgsk9g2
u3Mb5JYxCDFuXZCOfdgpz55UXmdz/71ZYIZQp7Vmwrv3icO5KYi4paZV4BlScMhwoT
5DzQkK1LkriEYjzOFnXOZ/8LLclvltH9cDLNGXDb+54X0kgtGCInejUs/Sps+JFbEy
cbeUi7G/dZgSw==
Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4KVWPk2Q0Dz9rxR;
Fri, 1 Apr 2022 22:05:46 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <bfc39f019ad2ae77f43a4ae84af251febb0c8b88.camel@posteo.net>
Subject: Re: RFC Errata junk
From: DJ Chase <u9000@posteo.mx>
To: tom petch <daedulus@btconnect.com>, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>,
Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2022 20:05:43 +0000
In-Reply-To: <62457C97.5070402@btconnect.com>
References: <CAOj+MMGTqqYjgSvrs1F7-aCwCcOf8Vhp+LXd+UGJkKfnKbKRFg@mail.gmail.com>
<63B0FDB4074D63C79049050D@PSB> <62457C97.5070402@btconnect.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/2RNhJ4tDFITEm9Vq1ZYn6QVNv08>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>,
<mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>,
<mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2022 20:06:03 -0000
On Thu, 2022-03-31 at 11:04 +0100, tom petch wrote: > A three-way handshake would do, as would a > CAPTCHA although I did see a report a few years ago that hackers could > now defeat them. Yeah, AIs can be trained to solve CAPTCHAs (which is really just an evolution of OCR), and people can always outsource CAPTCHA-solving to a human-based company. -- DJ Chase They, Them, Theirs
- RFC Errata junk Robert Raszuk
- Re: RFC Errata junk John C Klensin
- Re: RFC Errata junk Robert Raszuk
- Re: RFC Errata junk tom petch
- Re: RFC Errata junk Brian E Carpenter
- Re: RFC Errata junk DJ Chase