Re: Bake-off as trademark

Jim_Stephenson-Dunn@3com.com Tue, 07 November 2000 01:20 UTC

Received: by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) id UAA27655 for ietf-outbound.10@ietf.org; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 20:20:03 -0500 (EST)
Received: from topaz.3com.com (topaz.3com.com [192.156.136.158]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id UAA25213 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 20:11:03 -0500 (EST)
From: Jim_Stephenson-Dunn@3com.com
Received: from opal.3com.com (opal.3com.com [139.87.50.117]) by topaz.3com.com (Switch-2.0.1/Switch-2.0.1) with ESMTP id eA719rD04756; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 17:09:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hqoutbound.ops.3com.com (hqoutbound.OPS.3Com.COM [139.87.48.104]) by opal.3com.com (Switch-2.0.1/Switch-2.0.1) with SMTP id eA71AUs07978; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 17:10:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by hqoutbound.ops.3com.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.7 (934.1 12-30-1999)) id 88256990.00069FF3 ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 17:12:21 -0800
X-Lotus-FromDomain: 3COM
To: Anthony Atkielski <anthony@ATKIELSKI.COM>
cc: ietf@ietf.org
Message-ID: <88256990.00069EE6.00@hqoutbound.ops.3com.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2000 17:12:03 -0800
Subject: Re: Bake-off as trademark
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Loop: ietf@ietf.org


> I've been approached regarding the use of the
> (claimed-to-be) trademarked term bake-off. It
> would be helpful if somebody can provide credible
> evidence that this term has been used within
> the technical community for many years.

Did you know that Paramount Pictures has asserted trademark status for all
of the names of the characters in the original Star Trek series?  Only in
America!


Hmmm..... That is interesting in that I have a friend called James T. Kirk (the
T. is for Thomas instead of Tiberius). Does this mean that in the event of
paramount discovering the existence of this individual, they will sue him to
change his name ?

On the subject at hand though, I do not believe that a Trademark appies in this
case due to the fact that "bake-Off" is not a term that can be specifically and
individually applied to one company or product.

Just my two cents :-)

Jim