IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IAOC Request for community feedback

Rumbidzayi Gadhula <rumbiles@gmail.com> Tue, 23 October 2012 12:28 UTC

Return-Path: <rumbiles@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F8FC21F86F4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 05:28:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B4+RZ5nhRXX0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 05:28:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-f172.google.com (mail-ie0-f172.google.com [209.85.223.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0791E21F86F3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 05:28:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f172.google.com with SMTP id 9so6071337iec.31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 05:28:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=/a8dqWCd5l+lctWGgveaf4OsQ6MbNj+8AaGvaoxjcWM=; b=dQZjnE5C7t0RNaOAJILuOn93zWWKKRIwa2aYpFsXzt9lrSaTPM9QI/0Ou4jhJQDyi1 sZj4TDH3HtiejMzRk4nAMe0PCH63ujF/mfWNlCdmimW7eDkachY/WFFuJueIinPxiA4I EejLrgB8Tww360sG2UbRHZoJS/+6/3UsxOSZ52NpQYudpcn9Furf0MSFYxvWFW2VXSim 9tWiW4atbZqVzvV7TpxS+/rs9oAQH31IJi61jaQ9WXK6d6po3Ps75VFfyxF3+t21lnb5 JEyI7KfTrT0xTyyP+MenLgYIQWOfgEWN9ZhjoynEH53Y3rmY/QUXWhKuuH3VT/yfbebF TU5g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.154.227 with SMTP id vr3mr19731038igb.43.1350995327630; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 05:28:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.148.47 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 05:28:47 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <0f6301cdb113$2aab5960$80020c20$@olddog.co.uk>
References: <20121022234941.28301.7687.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <0f6301cdb113$2aab5960$80020c20$@olddog.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 14:28:47 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOnoajw+Xk+c6qRFa_cZDD3_Vx9F3VEMVCuXNH5jRZUjODvXrg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IAOC Request for community feedback
From: Rumbidzayi Gadhula <rumbiles@gmail.com>
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="14dae934085398be8e04ccb91ca5"
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 12:28:48 -0000

He has done tremendous work for the IETF. It however appaears as though he
really is unreachable and it makes sense that the post be treated as vacant.

On another note though, it is important to find out what happened to him as
what you have written appears out of character for him (neglecting his
duties). Do you have information on any of his next of kin, friends, other
colleagues, neighbors who you can contact to verify if everything is well
with him, even while his post is now vacant?

On 23 October 2012 13:40, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> wrote:

> > The IAOC is requesting feedback from the community whether it is
> > reasonable to declare Marshall's IAOC position vacant.
>
> Yes, with regret. Marshall has done a lot of good stuff for us over the
> years, and I hope he is well and functioning.
>
> However, Marshall filled a community-appointed post on the IAOC and it is
> important that the community is fully represented.
>
> So please ask NomCom to fill the vacant position.
>
> Adrian
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email