IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities

Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us> Tue, 04 April 2017 21:03 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@hxr.us>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEE21126557 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 14:03:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=hxr-us.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9frQ6qYapA_X for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 14:03:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22f.google.com (mail-oi0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA6411294F5 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 14:03:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id f193so178263352oib.2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Apr 2017 14:03:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hxr-us.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=gAXOoxLzVhG7QeHJmeBEPMKXYlpYbTpkd85p1x1WgM8=; b=MYSpW04V0Sn/uvidy5reSERbaz63sg9je+9nRrxGs2yTkCjKCzBSW63zxtMefUrsRM 9dbScwradOeg84gENo86YQkl1nOx3HydPhy9uri0dmoOKWliob1SnojerRTVusfVp4y3 5zzF5r9mQfqPDzWqq9LkUOgbN+Ps8UFLKBpVpKt2W+iw8s/E0JVAAuAdIupfOnbaJfhS +OgSuyswdPtzuUbjwdkWpYhIVzRr0MXvxc05N4q8v3JmBF+Ut/SVXdQ3BI+/VPyPBRzT ksUg+OgemeROQsJLwMztC3nFbCN73iSNIoKZR2mfyE7DstRCsjgVwTleE/21o/7God/A 8CWw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=gAXOoxLzVhG7QeHJmeBEPMKXYlpYbTpkd85p1x1WgM8=; b=lEax7nqdJLHCG9O6dZ0DaUt/nQbzsI7RbljDyBj4+xjaryM5yECsjfwBqJBToW3d24 R/I9NYwRtgog1tY1nmtWDUGOn/lcks9Hv5R8SVPnQmaHoCeQwFlwM31PGiUzM0udIvgT V2Ww0OwHt+C3sssYehDCjhfmGRbADgOHywVW1N4nJ3A2i5xCLNw85hwMY1wMjquz8z5U uevjUBeEKQJAIwSDDMSoO0e3Wn3dSS4RTulimdFrNP3D9eNO3bpft6o1+KzG/5AmQHLh d22GCwjkScwxVFuDYu9vKnVO0bxXsyaOXDcbNr4hjKsUCh9bA3Xmt30z1H115qawHTBc yxtQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H1TH8M+Mwy/bd3h0fACJyGP4yjmuJB8sZq+acDsAQuI/oWgC14HsjM3TvjkeZvbXkIQs9JJyPIljTfiCw==
X-Received: by 10.202.52.70 with SMTP id b67mr6362908oia.82.1491339790987; Tue, 04 Apr 2017 14:03:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.13.45 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 14:03:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [192.252.241.5]
In-Reply-To: <20170404204617.GC16732@puck.nether.net>
References: <149096990336.4276.3480662759931758139.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <9fee9874-1306-07a2-a84a-4e09381a5336@cisco.com> <E67FDB14-9895-48E0-A334-167172D322DB@nohats.ca> <20170403152624.GA11714@gsp.org> <93404c29-78ba-ff9b-9170-f5f2a5389a31@gmail.com> <E068F01A-B720-4E7A-A60F-AA5BDA22D535@consulintel.es> <20170404181505.GA4004@localhost> <CAAQiQRcvu-BfBA_NEqZwXsHEn6ujpa2=w7P5Vu2f6GLXjKqkcA@mail.gmail.com> <20170404202446.GB4004@localhost> <2987213d-075e-beff-64f8-d316709c404a@cs.tcd.ie> <20170404204617.GC16732@puck.nether.net>
From: Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us>
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2017 16:03:10 -0500
Message-ID: <CAAQiQRdL+QUNzKG_rLMiv+7_ZiUNCMKix=DpKMN=QQPrHi+E_w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities
To: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
Cc: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/2XzflXnZAOFsRFDggwN5gEmH97g>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2017 21:03:14 -0000

On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net> wrote:
>         I welcome the data that is being collected vs all the
> armchair responses.
>
>         This reminds me of the IPv6-only question, there's the
> zero users that were on the IPv6-only ssid in chicago.  This may
> be a real issue, or not.
>
>         I think the thread can end until the data is reported
> and we can then provide our commentary on that.

I agree with Nico and Jared on this point.
-andy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email