IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [92all] IETF Hackathon at IETF 92, March 21-22, Dallas, TX

Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com> Tue, 24 February 2015 19:09 UTC

Return-Path: <cheshire@apple.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3FDE1A8775 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 11:09:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xhc09aDrEhkZ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 11:09:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-in2.apple.com (mail-out2.apple.com [17.151.62.25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01D6D1A8866 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 11:09:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=apple.com; s=mailout2048s; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; i=@apple.com; t=1424804973; x=2288718573; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-id:To:Cc:MIME-version:Content-type: Content-transfer-encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-reply-to:References:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=eRVK6INSmuCIO16PFywjwdRKsDenDv31dLeEXD02SCU=; b=1eKCFJ3xp7QLGaH50n2rl5P9je03oc6W8GW8zb54/kQPlGYEzpno7j2SZv8NaMjX D4zRhx+pckyZXG2QWN9U/n2StSm2cEj5zoHZfMz90XFQ3+v0IuYORZA0MJbmcqj/ gS1L7TmEgPRJ3I6c/w0clfjjUcuwRI1ZlXKuQrz71y9v4gdEOH/fjPD1BpEkhyQa bz3KjCOW10+yPqtBpT7Csrifp8emYnDQYMBUF9lsmLkQdSplJ9ISHH+4MFFaO3Vx S8Z40bu+99qfKrHz3KJ3UwGlusdpXLgAnLHFH3ndZEAXZK5U38AzyAePPJuZFrcy F/VNr4UwjlRn4Lfc9868Ag==;
Received: from relay5.apple.com (relay5.apple.com [17.128.113.88]) by mail-in2.apple.com (Apple Secure Mail Relay) with SMTP id 13.2D.00537.D6CCCE45; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 11:09:33 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: 11973e11-f79e16d000000219-33-54eccc6df69a
Received: from koseret (koseret.apple.com [17.151.62.39]) (using TLS with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay5.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id DF.68.32046.F6CCCE45; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 11:09:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from chesh7.apple.com ([17.193.13.47]) by koseret.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.30.0 64bit (built Oct 22 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0NKA0055MIJXCS30@koseret.apple.com> for ietf@ietf.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 11:09:33 -0800 (PST)
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\))
Subject: Re: [92all] IETF Hackathon at IETF 92, March 21-22, Dallas, TX
From: Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com>
In-reply-to: <CAHw9_iKpmEOFyZ5Mi=6KcsEoLHDVCwFTi5q_0GfK-d5B1X_Hdg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 11:09:32 -0800
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Message-id: <7E5194B1-4717-4225-85C6-E969EF7800A7@apple.com>
References: <20150224170152.6224.60832.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <DBC7E705-B163-46E8-AC9B-97BDC33E7C68@apple.com> <54ECBC5E.2030001@dcrocker.net> <CAHw9_iKpmEOFyZ5Mi=6KcsEoLHDVCwFTi5q_0GfK-d5B1X_Hdg@mail.gmail.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrKLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUi2FAYoZt75k2IQfMROYtnG+ezODB6LFny kymAMYrLJiU1J7MstUjfLoEro2nic+aCq2wV899sZmxgXMHaxcjJISFgIrHu4n02CFtM4sK9 9UA2F4eQwF5GiafTXsAV9X96xQKRaGGSOPv7LzuE084kseXpcuYuRg4OZgF1iSlTckEaeAX0 JJqePGYCsYUF3CX2v/vOCGKzCWhJvPh8BWwbp0CwxPwPj8FsFgFViTdnP4DZzALaEk/eXWCF mGMjsezPbWaIXXcYgRb3M4HsEhEQlDj42BLiOFmJfxfPgN0jIfCSVeLRkylsExiFZiGcNAvJ SbOQrFjAyLyKUSg3MTNHNzPPSC+xoCAnVS85P3cTIyhcp9sJ7mA8vsrqEKMAB6MSD+8BmTch QqyJZcWVuYcYpTlYlMR5K/YDhQTSE0tSs1NTC1KL4otKc1KLDzEycXBKNTDGLDo9MUNszmv5 Uxs/rd6g5lb2RGjG4dc8xzTu8X+KC/zhmhZ0//eZvurKhd7L9l+TXtJwL7bdsG2XYJS6WUrY zKtfVgjv99kr9bzyfUn0nmNxsnOvsTbnJihpbc1ebKKzneXdxeuX9/y8nvn57pmfnDdOvW4W OKgquvRC8KW47oc7jn0uNFi6VYmlOCPRUIu5qDgRANoBRxg4AgAA
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprBLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUiON1OXbfgzJsQg2eP2SyebZzP4sDosWTJ T6YAxigum5TUnMyy1CJ9uwSujKaJz5kLrrJVzH+zmbGBcQVrFyMnh4SAiUT/p1csELaYxIV7 69m6GLk4hARamCTO/v7LDuG0M0lsebqcuYuRg4NZQF1iypRckAZeAT2JpiePmUBsYQF3if3v vjOC2GwCWhIvPl9hA7E5BYIl5n94DGazCKhKvDn7AcxmFtCWePLuAivEHBuJZX9uM0PsusMI tLifCWSXiICgxMHHlhDHyUr8u3iGfQIj/yyEK2YhuWIWkqkLGJlXMQoUpeYkVprqJRYU5KTq JefnbmIEhVdDYcQOxv/LrA4xCnAwKvHwHpB5EyLEmlhWXJl7iFGCg1lJhHfDZqAQb0piZVVq UX58UWlOavEhRmkOFiVx3gkrXocICaQnlqRmp6YWpBbBZJk4OKUaGGV3JG201+H5/kk2n2/K KsP1Hg6F968kpHXeY2BwjDWeYVXF+jPjzPQlb5bcnR6yc8PRele2eZ0rhHxXbnjz7NL0C83S ynGVvrzXZ6XK1RV83Ls6Q1GT8WjBy+suC0TiKi7sfmEusipo1nrWwj88pgwTuqQNuPr3lKSf vu3yQGamwfsVd4t5vymxFGckGmoxFxUnAgDxchJWKwIAAA==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/2Y-ETuovTBKTb-kDu6FyTITw4Ws>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 19:09:36 -0000

On 24 Feb, 2015, at 10:21, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:

> I'm really glad that someone has actually bothered
> organizing such a thing. If it turns out to be useful, perhaps it will
> be announced earlier in the future. We kvetch about lack of running
> code, missing implementations, etc - let's not also kvetch too much
> when someone tries to organize something to improve the situation.

I second this.

Thanks to the people who organized the hackathon.

My fear is that if 90% of IETF attendees have already booked their flights, that leaves the hackathon drawing from the remaining 10%. (The 10% who are too busy to get their flights booked yet.)

If this event is even a moderate success, let’s treat that as a positive sign and try again next time, with an earlier announcement.

Stuart Cheshire

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email