Re: BCP97bis

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Mon, 18 October 2021 19:36 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 551443A0749 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 12:36:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.55
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.55 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.452, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3M7pWRzfBH0e for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 12:36:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBBA53A074D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 12:36:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050102.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050102.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 19IJQnmM009438; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 20:36:19 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=0PC49jazLkUAdlWYoIwxB5iScL/Tk5z7Zhd381UvDro=; b=mHHudC8qlj3ByNqutsq9/afMK6MdIhjptmYWaPyjNUf0mKDeyl2ChvOgoF6FQ+MurpKI S+okuFOrVhNNJ+aShKJ6EFXvkHAK/le2Kw1dTPj1zUR/sD37DpgHHdVTO+5sJo2zI9iJ oVKstvtvKFBw8QeIjZp6K1cQLTvyFdR1cx9RnTtzDZyW4DRMIriT9q7bgRzsEIZ1+8bG u0H2vxVAJmYTyrPHT5jZ3O9gZGxweNtcwqltC1UB31LtonN5veRXPlHjt0gUKqRO70iJ SYxtUTyNSs6Q0B0/TfQFQBHqluoon1/NVbZ8baErfd1M287ELgM2WlAuMhIzq9gONRHp FA==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint5 (prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com [184.51.33.60] (may be forged)) by m0050102.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 3bsbmvvpch-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 18 Oct 2021 20:36:19 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 19IJK54H018137; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 12:36:18 -0700
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.31]) by prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com with ESMTP id 3bqvqbm8ag-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 18 Oct 2021 12:36:18 -0700
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.23; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 15:36:17 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.023; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 15:36:17 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
CC: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: BCP97bis
Thread-Topic: BCP97bis
Thread-Index: AQHXwef7YbcJzymQ9E23b0PBRXQisqvYd0eAgAAmFACAADe6gIAARFyA//+9wgCAAEQYgP//wCaAgABwxQD//97OgA==
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 19:36:16 +0000
Message-ID: <3A02E2BD-05B7-4FF2-B91C-129424417ECF@akamai.com>
References: <CAL0qLwbwvs2Cp_urgJ=hzc6yEMGDaz3C0xf6RQXRrB89wAx=Rw@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwavK5dYdmYPVxdMT5rA=jBZv1cEyAsVBEWOD7p9MoZR1g@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwa4ChOsuMkmoP_sAGv3Wn2AcSz1OkijmxZzP+MGvnwviA@mail.gmail.com> <849D7F9E-8AD4-4CE8-A66C-358FB1F2E6AE@tzi.org> <3AC61568-DBDC-4ADB-9935-9C53333AE7E2@akamai.com> <CAL0qLwZvCq7R=WBFsrwf51CKSN8ur0Yj-F=VOHnP=hQD0ooj-A@mail.gmail.com> <890A4965-D847-4606-849C-A0C8D8FD3B0C@akamai.com> <CAL0qLwZtBiuh5n3U_pKma1s4ymPOCy7CY0pFaaacx6NDYNu5AQ@mail.gmail.com> <44C4286C-408C-4280-8956-3DA2931AFFF1@akamai.com> <CAL0qLwZaxKTwout-M2eKm2R9s7-kHzXW_uj626FLJ7y4X28PFw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwZaxKTwout-M2eKm2R9s7-kHzXW_uj626FLJ7y4X28PFw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.54.21101001
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.27.164.43]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_3A02E2BD05B74FF2B91C129424417ECFakamaicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.425, 18.0.790 definitions=2021-10-18_07:2021-10-18, 2021-10-18 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=915 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2109230001 definitions=main-2110180108
X-Proofpoint-GUID: frGFkYxBpXNOi_-xHebq_MJoGblQyucV
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: frGFkYxBpXNOi_-xHebq_MJoGblQyucV
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.182.1,Aquarius:18.0.790,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.0.607.475 definitions=2021-10-18_07,2021-10-18_01,2020-04-07_01
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 clxscore=1015 impostorscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=878 adultscore=0 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2109230001 definitions=main-2110180108
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/2cXJ8ktLL2iKB_qb98mbjeu2K5o>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 19:36:26 -0000

So I’m notice that a single-author AD-sponsored BCP revision is getting a relatively lot amount of pushback on one particular area from a number of very experienced IETFers (to be clear: other than me).

Perhaps an AD sponsoring a BCP written by another AD is not the best way forward for something that has such a broad impact.