Re: Publishing the Tao as a web page

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Wed, 13 June 2012 20:07 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1CB221F8474 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 13:07:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.587
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.587 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.012, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sVNhozqZRWcH for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 13:07:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from odin.smetech.net (mail.smetech.net [208.254.26.82]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DACEA21F846C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 13:07:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [208.254.26.81]) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC386F24036; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 16:07:19 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smetech.net
Received: from odin.smetech.net ([208.254.26.82]) by localhost (ronin.smetech.net [208.254.26.81]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QRQJvGyXyumG; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 16:06:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.110] (pool-96-255-37-161.washdc.fios.verizon.net [96.255.37.161]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48733F24014; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 16:07:18 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Publishing the Tao as a web page
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <867BD23C-3581-4EDC-B4FF-973FEEBC253C@vpnc.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 16:06:59 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B0C00137-E868-4017-AF5D-932848AEF6A2@vigilsec.com>
References: <CC1638DA-817E-4F2C-BD29-5EFED6CFCAEF@vpnc.org> <867BD23C-3581-4EDC-B4FF-973FEEBC253C@vpnc.org>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 20:07:02 -0000

Paul:

It implies that the current RFC will become the initial web page content.  I think that is not the case.  Rather, the initial content will come from draft-hoffman-tao4677bis.

Do you want draft-hoffman-tao4677bis to be published as the final RFC version in the Tao series?

Russ


On Jun 12, 2012, at 7:01 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:

> Based on the earlier comments, I have revised the proposal. See draft-hoffman-tao-as-web-page-01, diffs at <tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-hoffman-tao-as-web-page-01>.
> 
> --Paul Hoffman