IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-hoffman-tao-as-web-page-02.txt> (Publishing the "Tao of the IETF" as a Web Page) to Informational RFC

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Thu, 05 July 2012 21:34 UTC

Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDBD221F864E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 14:34:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.569
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.569 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.030, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PE8zA+V7kRjQ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 14:34:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (bsa2.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 336EA21F864D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 14:34:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [198.252.137.115] (helo=JcK-HP8200.jck.com) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1Smtcb-00089j-V9; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 17:29:57 -0400
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 17:34:55 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-hoffman-tao-as-web-page-02.txt> (Publishing the "Tao of the IETF" as a Web Page) to Informational RFC
Message-ID: <0055B78D874058F9ECEC6E10@JcK-HP8200.jck.com>
In-Reply-To: <F404FCF4-3E55-4F5B-A17C-B6D85C84824C@vpnc.org>
References: <20120615202915.11032.53296.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6F9AF4A4C9466A87A81F1823@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <F404FCF4-3E55-4F5B-A17C-B6D85C84824C@vpnc.org>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 21:34:55 -0000

--On Thursday, July 05, 2012 14:19 -0700 Paul Hoffman
<paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> wrote:

> Based on many people's input (most recently, John's), I have
> updated the draft to more cleanly separate out the history of
> the Tao from the change that is happening.

Paul,

While I'd prefer to see you go even further in that direction
(e.g., incorporating more of the RFC 4677 Abstract in this
abstract, constructing things so that changes in the details of
editing procedures doesn't require a revised RFC), this version
is, IMO, greatly improved.

thanks
   john

v2.20.3 | Report a Bug | By Email