IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IPv4 Outage Planned for IETF 71 Plenary

Norbert Bollow <nb@bollow.ch> Mon, 17 December 2007 09:27 UTC

Return-path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J4CGR-000590-3C; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 04:27:55 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J4CGP-0004uQ-6n for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 04:27:53 -0500
Received: from tarsus.bollow.ch ([82.195.230.222]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J4CGM-0005KY-VF for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 04:27:53 -0500
Received: from tarsus.bollow.ch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tarsus.bollow.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0913B281B5 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:12:53 +0100 (CET)
Authentication-Results: tarsus.bollow.ch from=nb@bollow.ch; domainkey=neutral (no signature; no policy for bollow.ch)
Received: from quill.bollow.ch (157-55.203-62.cust.bluewin.ch [62.203.55.157]) by tarsus.bollow.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:12:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: by quill.bollow.ch (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CDA83220285; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 10:35:19 +0100 (CET)
From: Norbert Bollow <nb@bollow.ch>
Organization: Bollow Software Economics Research
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
To: ietf@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <0C29D33E-3BAD-4564-B0F3-6F7A5D1A8B59@muada.com> (message from Iljitsch van Beijnum on Sat, 15 Dec 2007 19:55:03 +0100)
References: <E1J3IFS-0002yV-CG@ietf.org> <20071214220518.GA14379@sources.org> <47631201.1070303@bogus.com> <p06240806c388d88dc9de@[165.227.249.204]> <a06240800c388daca0917@[192.168.1.101]> <4763EBD3.50804@cisco.com> <37AF8EDE-2B6F-49DB-8D02-0674B4F47677@multicasttech.com> <0C29D33E-3BAD-4564-B0F3-6F7A5D1A8B59@muada.com>
Message-Id: <20071217093519.CDA83220285@quill.bollow.ch>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 10:35:19 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----)
X-Scan-Signature: 856eb5f76e7a34990d1d457d8e8e5b7f
Subject: Re: IPv4 Outage Planned for IETF 71 Plenary
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com> wrote:

> But what about transition mechanisms, or would that be unfair?

IMO it would be unfair on IPv6 to do the test without setting up
transition mechanisms similar to what an ISP would supply when
trying to sell IPv6-only internet connectivity (in the sense of
"not dual-stack to the customer edge") to end-users.

Greetings,
Norbert.


-- 
Norbert Bollow <nb@bollow.ch>                      http://Norbert.ch
President of the Swiss Internet User Group SIUG    http://SIUG.ch
Working on establishing a non-corrupt and
truly /open/ international standards organization  http://OpenISO.org

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email