Preferred usage "Internet Drafts" vs "Internet-Drafts"
Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com> Sun, 14 August 2016 16:40 UTC
Return-Path: <dean.willis@softarmor.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A18312D59B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Aug 2016 09:40:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=softarmor.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bE-WxeXTVLRB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Aug 2016 09:40:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x232.google.com (mail-oi0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DA3A12D563 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Aug 2016 09:40:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x232.google.com with SMTP id l203so37740513oib.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Aug 2016 09:40:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=softarmor.com; s=google; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=1FRZhgJP0jzYXIMk+5TmLAnW38xBzKAGY7QvDjigqEo=; b=AcNRYR32UNeuPZj4jUJqgXI7ifd5I7yosF0aoj+eLWOrEZqh1hjIqYpSRY41N546LX 8Z/Ci9ebfB0whCCZE4388eTeAr/h4xgKmupfd9HuiNZaDGKhYSL9TCn7KRQHFXY+vIEK lQ549bdG8j68nejHl3Pzb241TEjNM154YrI/8=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1FRZhgJP0jzYXIMk+5TmLAnW38xBzKAGY7QvDjigqEo=; b=m+G+InNxDwt+d0fLHjqZxldef8PS5zncAL40Pan66JXSNuUS1f56pS6wfCEsItDlbt evdu4+QfDBzo+R2859U0dWAVXroOSHBHnHCTARCITHcEDrfVnek2sn3J6tR5axLJvMpj m+shO1diCxtK6M62JamYIfHwkGGfVNwKebiucNNwa7BL5wnR9ti5f4udypBtXTg1VMTf VhOMQZQoFuSYqAQppxjyn9nC8GfU1XztsiayQ0+Eb82Vy7vHLSZMHUnIXsFnxW72Z19c eYUnyFsjdVIrcSNqDNczR/spBGs+3KjeXCKcz2HAhemqT59LVcoruN/b8wqek9wsj0kE 3atA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoousJdnJTBMePVB/1t9+ylcHgvbNTHsLIowhlG08DYusH25wEV/1tf73gt0za2J75Yw==
X-Received: by 10.157.12.232 with SMTP id o37mr10561698otd.107.1471192817622; Sun, 14 Aug 2016 09:40:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([216.243.244.98]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j47sm7681615otd.38.2016.08.14.09.40.16 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 14 Aug 2016 09:40:16 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf@ietf.org
From: Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com>
Subject: Preferred usage "Internet Drafts" vs "Internet-Drafts"
Message-ID: <a3562189-c861-a221-9a2b-412364228474@softarmor.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 11:40:15 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/35P47RouDeyIMrGbRXH7lR3iCHk>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 16:40:20 -0000
Okay, this is probably trivial. My life is trivia. As a matter of style. I think of "internet drafts" as the documents we process, and "internet-drafts" as the role-name for the I-D administrator. The IETF web site mixes the usage. See: https://www.ietf.org/id-info/ The tao uses the hyphenated form: https://www.ietf.org/tao.html Is there an actual preference in the community, or is the usage seen as completely equivalent and interchangeable?
- Re: Preferred usage "Internet Drafts" vs "Interne… Brian E Carpenter
- Preferred usage "Internet Drafts" vs "Internet-Dr… Dean Willis