Subject: Re: #506, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-24
From: Julian Reschke <[email-masked]>
To: S Moonesamy <[email-masked]>, [email-masked], [email-masked]
Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked]
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 09:57:02 +0100
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>

On 2013-10-30 08:46, S Moonesamy wrote:
> ...
>> Such as?
>
> What I mean is that what happens is undefined when both sides do not
> follow the RFC 2119 "should".

The response is self-descriptive, so it's up to the client to properly 
process it.

>> It is supposed to be interpreted per RFC 2119.
>
> It is better to use the uppercase words after the RFC 2119 boilerplate.

But then, we don't want the boilerplate to be in front of the 
Introduction. Any *concrete* suggestion how to address this?

Best regards, Julian