Re: tools.ietf.org -- basics not working?

Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org> Sun, 17 October 2021 01:29 UTC

Return-Path: <exec-director@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45A9D3A09FF for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Oct 2021 18:29:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9-niHFhrXYg6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Oct 2021 18:29:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfx.ietf.org (ietfx.ietf.org [4.31.198.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19A9B3A0A05 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Oct 2021 18:29:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfx.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAF494127A5F; Sat, 16 Oct 2021 18:29:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from ietfx.ietf.org ([4.31.198.45]) by localhost (ietfx.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OCqcpYYVt4LJ; Sat, 16 Oct 2021 18:29:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [158.140.230.105]) by ietfx.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A4D244127A50; Sat, 16 Oct 2021 18:29:18 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: tools.ietf.org -- basics not working?
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2021 14:29:14 +1300
Message-Id: <9BF8BE80-31F1-4083-AC57-93F738DAB97A@ietf.org>
References: <20211016.124232.936466035773757308.he@uninett.no>
Cc: brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com, ietf@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <20211016.124232.936466035773757308.he@uninett.no>
To: Havard Eidnes <he=40uninett.no@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (18G82)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/3APSjtze23X8DuNA43nRAwAaKkE>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2021 01:29:25 -0000


> On 16/10/2021, at 11:43 PM, Havard Eidnes <he=40uninett.no@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> 
>> 
>> I guess you missed this:
>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/0n-6EXEmkTp3Uv_vj-5Vnm3o0bo
> 
> That's entirely possible, though I did catch some related
> discussion.
> 
> Someone pointed out that the "fetch RFC by number" functionality
> is now again working, so that's good, at least.
> 
> The document indexes for "RFCs" and "Documents" are still dead.
> 
> I would have hoped for and expected a "make before break"
> transition strategy...

Yes we all would have preferred that but tools.ietf.org is not controlled by the IETF.  We are working hard and putting considerable resources into standing up new services as replacements but that unfortunately is all we can do.

Jay 

-- 
Jay Daley
IETF Executive Director 
exec-director@ietf.org
> 
> Regards,
> 
> - Håvard
>