IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Alternative decision process in RTCWeb

Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> Fri, 29 November 2013 03:38 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DEC11AE15C; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 19:38:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MAc6Nog1tTA7; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 19:38:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from exprod7og121.obsmtp.com (exprod7og121.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.20]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EC201AE15A; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 19:38:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob121.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUpgMJ+M9Y2yDOmkFS7DQ8Hb1qWOKt+eL@postini.com; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 19:38:15 PST
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 411DC1B82E8; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 19:38:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-02.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FA28190043; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 19:38:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vpna-132.vpn.nominum.com (192.168.1.10) by CAS-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 19:38:08 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1822\))
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Alternative decision process in RTCWeb
From: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B0EF1B8@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 22:38:03 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <D45703FF-109A-4FFF-92E9-1CC7767C52F7@nominum.com>
References: <DUB127-W23531D0E8B15570331DB51E0EE0@phx.gbl> <52974AA8.6080702@cisco.com> <1F79045E-8CD0-4C5D-9090-3E82853E62E9@nominum.com> <52976F56.4020706@dcrocker.net> <3CD78695-47AD-4CDF-B486-3949FFDC107B@nominum.com> <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B0EF1B8@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
To: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1822)
X-Originating-IP: [192.168.1.10]
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com>, "rtcweb-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <rtcweb-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 03:38:17 -0000

On Nov 28, 2013, at 8:07 PM, DRAGE, Keith (Keith) <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
> If you still believe it so, please tell me when you think the WG decided this.

I'm just going by what people have told me.   If the working group hasn't indeed been asked whether they would accept the outcome of a coin toss, I would argue that that question should be asked.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email