Re[2]: DMARC and yahoo

mohammed serrhini <serrhini@mail.ru> Wed, 16 April 2014 00:16 UTC

Return-Path: <serrhini@mail.ru>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 268B31A004E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 17:16:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 3.15
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.15 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.979, HELO_EQ_RU=0.595, HOST_EQ_RU=0.875, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eWb8kSSTtRRx for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 17:15:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from f361.i.mail.ru (f361.i.mail.ru [217.69.141.3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F30A1A004A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 17:15:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mail.ru; s=mail2; h=References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Message-ID:Reply-To:Date:Mime-Version:Subject:To:From; bh=Sqtppb5+xyhLKlonzrpGP2Nsr8L4D2kzSzCH9FXcJRM=; b=uaDDk03TXKpANiP/SSyFnPElVywOgkEuw4a00b1dK974Vm7hxGrOJs2ghbIeIRtnjWhGd4gsNscxIqTUZ4cesRHBZIVl/iASww+zxJqWf048gegej2rNpwtpBcgc6VWCr3SKGMyz20ZDDqYFZcefvNfS9vyQ7JlJGaWLbpJv4pc=;
Received: from mail by f361.i.mail.ru with local (envelope-from <serrhini@mail.ru>) id 1WaDW4-0001Di-Mx; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 04:15:52 +0400
Received: from [41.137.68.4] by e.mail.ru with HTTP; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 04:15:52 +0400
From: =?UTF-8?B?bW9oYW1tZWQgc2Vycmhpbmk=?= <serrhini@mail.ru>
To: =?UTF-8?B?VGhlb2RvcmUgVHMnbw==?= <tytso@mit.edu>, =?UTF-8?B?aWV0ZkBpZXRmLm9yZw==?= <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmVbMl06IERNQVJDIGFuZCB5YWhvbw==?=
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Mail.Ru Mailer 1.0
X-Originating-IP: [41.137.68.4]
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 04:15:52 +0400
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <1397607352.389753533@f361.i.mail.ru>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--ALT--6tvzelpv1397607352"
X-Mras: Ok
X-Spam: undefined
In-Reply-To: <20140415214348.GL4456@thunk.org>
References: <CAKW6Ri6OUmxGaBOGR2hoWpDOGWsVQ9tQ2Q9ogkT5wzFhFJLBbQ@mail.gmail.com> <534D9C2C.8010606@gmail.com> <20140415214348.GL4456@thunk.org>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/3IBgUWAFWMrUpmQlz2IVffMb1_c
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: =?UTF-8?B?bW9oYW1tZWQgc2Vycmhpbmk=?= <serrhini@mail.ru>
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 00:16:01 -0000

The problem is with the alignment requirements of DMARC.  That can't be easily fixed without breaking existing mailing list functionality.and  to give others  mail services had made the necessary changes.
Yahoo recognizes that  " Yahoo is the first major email provider in the world to adopt this  aggressive level of DMARC policy on behalf of theirs users. "
to protect users we do not need to be aggressive .



С уважением,
mohammed serrhini
serrhini@mail.ru