Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use of PowerPoint in meetings
t.p. <daedulus@btconnect.com> Thu, 20 March 2014 10:11 UTC
Return-Path: <daedulus@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 067031A086D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 03:11:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j2J-0irDtVqg for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 03:11:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from emea01-am1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-am1lp0013.outbound.protection.outlook.com [213.199.154.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E39611A08A0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 03:11:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DB3PRD0210HT005.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com (157.56.253.69) by AMSPR07MB248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.242.19.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.898.11; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 10:11:42 +0000
Message-ID: <00b201cf4424$02fa4020$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
From: "t.p." <daedulus@btconnect.com>
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
References: <5328F67A.2070605@att.com> <20140319030341.26234.qmail@joyce.lan> <CAMm+LwhcTkW4wP_rbRzgGdhNWrv8NUPs9ACudjOpTuCsMXm1vg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use of PowerPoint in meetings
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 10:05:57 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Originating-IP: [157.56.253.69]
X-ClientProxiedBy: DB4PR07CA003.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.242.229.13) To AMSPR07MB248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.242.19.27)
X-Forefront-PRVS: 01565FED4C
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009001)(6009001)(428001)(13464003)(51704005)(199002)(189002)(377454003)(62236002)(44716002)(63696002)(85306002)(79102001)(85852003)(92566001)(92726001)(74366001)(81542001)(90146001)(74876001)(56816005)(50466002)(89996001)(20776003)(47776003)(93136001)(87976001)(69226001)(88136002)(14496001)(62966002)(61296002)(65816001)(80022001)(83072002)(66066001)(59766001)(54316002)(77982001)(87286001)(47736001)(56776001)(86362001)(4396001)(94316002)(93516002)(42186004)(87266001)(95666003)(53806001)(74706001)(49866001)(84392001)(44736004)(77156001)(74502001)(76482001)(50226001)(23756003)(47976001)(50986001)(93916002)(1411001)(47446002)(51856001)(80976001)(77096001)(97336001)(19580405001)(94946001)(46102001)(81342001)(95416001)(76786001)(76796001)(74662001)(97186001)(31966008)(83322001)(19580395003)(33646001)(74416001)(7726001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:AMSPR07MB248; H:DB3PRD0210HT005.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com; FPR:7EB6F058.9622A4C6.72F49D78.4ACADC78.202FE; MLV:nov; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:0; MX:1; LANG:en;
Received-SPF: None (: btconnect.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/3Y3PybMbg2TeVl_KggU4_l6QiJ0
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 10:11:56 -0000
----- Original Message ----- From: "Phillip Hallam-Baker" <hallam@gmail.com> To: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Cc: "IETF Discussion Mailing List" <ietf@ietf.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 7:41 PM > For what we use it for, powerpoint is actually useful. > > Most cases what is put up on slides is examples. And I find it much > easier to follow an example that is written down than one that is > read. > > The other point that is overlooked by the powerpoint haters is that > the principal value is that it rescues incompetent speakers. There are > some people who are good speakers at IETF but the speaking > qualification is only an opinion and a keyboard. Being able to > organize a logical series of thoughts does not come into it. > > I am more than happy to present without slides. The reason I write > them is that the meeting organizers DEMAND them. And they are quite > right to do that because I have two speaking modes one of which is > PowerPoint and the other is 'TED talk'. > > Guess which one has the technical content. The most striking feature for me of IETF89 was the failure of almost all WG Chairs to produce a PowerPoint display at all, without some trial and error. Most laptops etc these days have a widescreen aspect ratio (WHY???) whereas none of the projectors did, so what appeared on the screen tended to be the top left corner or right hand extreme or ... of the Agenda, Note Well and so on. It seems a shame to get so many engineers together in a room and then spend five minutes trying to get a display working. PowerPoint may rescue incompetent speakers but it does nothing for those who cannot interface a laptop to a projector. Tom Petch
- it's been a while since we discussed the use of P… Tony Hansen
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use … John Levine
- RE: it's been a while since we discussed the use … l.wood
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use … Henning G Schulzrinne
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use … Dale R. Worley
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use … Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use … David Morris
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use … Hector Santos
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use … t.p.
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use … Yoav Nir
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use … Frank Solensky
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use … Scott Brim
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use … Klaas Wierenga (kwiereng)
- RE: it's been a while since we discussed the use … l.wood
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use … Mukom Akong T.
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use … t.p.