Re: snarls in real life

Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com> Wed, 21 April 2021 02:46 UTC

Return-Path: <brong@fastmailteam.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 610F63A0A9F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 19:46:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmailteam.com header.b=GyNY6leW; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=P3maZZyY
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PjpZmSfhZTgq for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 19:46:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E5493A0F0C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 19:46:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EB085C0138 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 22:46:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap41 ([10.202.2.91]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 20 Apr 2021 22:46:26 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= fastmailteam.com; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to :references:date:from:to:subject:content-type; s=fm2; bh=kcfulYR 4voeUMPQXvkC6NTRGx17oTku+O2CZxgLOumc=; b=GyNY6leWSi0MLFaHcZs2V7R THkDTyfQBYvdh0emZcap8ajgcnnl5SdshZ6outBwZtKGHtybjH6u2HDju+W00n7J NYSDxW7KCjZRfSZA9WWzzrTCw5kgFTV+StvOs7wMK/Iyg/gKY0li7VbAMfFnP/cK Wev4U8yAR1kOT4Gh+UPhZfupSzGDcEXzo6xBCmNtjAMwY38EEE8AFHLix5M7yVCg G9TObRf5dqeWtoINAl6MIkF6FKZnSNuuFTtUz/jFo8c+lAuyjykJa7VBiyGG5fEU YueDhvIcbaRWTkUoc0u2CG+5yBMeM955c7VRJhU/9gl5ugkK/mV22pubXQwRNqQ= =
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=kcfulY R4voeUMPQXvkC6NTRGx17oTku+O2CZxgLOumc=; b=P3maZZyYFvOn3k2WDaxF0y FiVdnyVL1Ij4eTXdgqT6lucj7BUOYvEk+uK4TgqNgx8YagrBcKKFOj9qYWyiDaE1 /Ko3k7uAHA/M1MGMcsiKVSLS8IMIPQuJo34GkS0iZUgUbgXLHThZTRn8PePf5/wv G3d0TIkWyWQ2G2igy+UUefIl04bA5ElkiHMGG2HK7W9yzZxRYxPUphM1+mDucIZE q7nwv2otqQVzb1GFDPB7DPXF8LA+EFW1BhHu4eJeKL0d/8fOgNcN3RPuOgFWaydT mw6vw2jIx9j3QZGG66S9531UXIiOWSJpKuozESHNTRdvdfG9kkb7qad++WJc8SaQ ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:ApJ_YEyKweTz-5D7VhZUl8Uk7v7JFB3Rsob1tz-4M8Q6XUoev3Kscw> <xme:ApJ_YIRGrvZ6zAXUAATo1VM_c6uxj8Hq4ZUHwrY7vpKLIgva0-WatTE_mB7WkIG-H Nso3i0hb78>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvddtjedgieduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsegrtd erreerredtnecuhfhrohhmpedfuehrohhnucfiohhnugifrghnrgdfuceosghrohhnghes fhgrshhtmhgrihhlthgvrghmrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeffveefiefgje evteehheelgeetleetveeguedthfehgffhtdejhfdvhefhtdekgfenucffohhmrghinhep ihgvthhfrdhorhhgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilh hfrhhomhepsghrohhnghesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlthgvrghmrdgtohhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:ApJ_YGX2ngyGRSFjq58OVr4Rwxxe2T4-ZrafbL_RxI6Y0aXfLLQ_Iw> <xmx:ApJ_YCgTDTHxuVTzSogaE6tTAQUNh9VP4ME0ZTqPsu8MnmTyM6liRA> <xmx:ApJ_YGDc6jbBRsTMTbBLymbwn2l7sXMiWCjLUjSSiWmk7ckXfXBGMg> <xmx:ApJ_YJNyJG9b0g7_vRz5sAvt0GIxULTIVsGLvvXkm1znENMCw_UpZQ>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 0CD28260005F; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 22:46:26 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-403-gbc3c488b23-fm-20210419.005-gbc3c488b
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <19f2b2e1-6365-480a-86f2-111377cac2de@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <93fedaa0-5ad0-dcc0-ff01-43b8e1c97989@mtcc.com>
References: <93fedaa0-5ad0-dcc0-ff01-43b8e1c97989@mtcc.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 12:46:04 +1000
From: "Bron Gondwana" <brong@fastmailteam.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: snarls in real life
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=6a3682111d0649f9b4c7179ed07097e0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/3ZRxJ2JeIloYInNy-cIQ2q5fjD4>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 02:46:35 -0000

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021, at 11:31, Michael Thomas wrote:
> So against my better judgement, I posted my Quic, the Elephant in the 
> Room post to the Quic list. Within 24 hours one of the snarling working 
> group chairs declared it off topic and demanded it stop. This is what I 
> mean about grotesque fiefdoms where the working groups are so fricking 
> insular that any commentary outside of their blinders is not tolerated. 
> The thought that no working group business can take place in the face of 
> anything other than something directly relatable working group business 
> is a complete piece of idiocy and shuts down anything they don't want to 
> hear. People are capable of doing all of this all at once.

Oh cool - thanks for posting that.  It's a very instructive thread.

Some general thoughts:
 * it's not enough to be technically correct (disclaimer: I'm not well enough versed in this area to know if you are), it's also important to do the work to socialise your idea and persuade others so that they become evangelists for you as well.
 * if you require the assistance of others to run experiments for you, it's wise not to piss them off
 * there's a whole fallacy somewhere which I've had to address a few times already in my own working groups, but which I still commonly see, along the lines of "big companies have masses of resources and hence can easily run experiments or implement arbitrary ideas - and have an obligation to do so when requested/demanded".  They don't, you have to persuade them just as much as anyone else, plus they're slower to move and harder to persuade.
I'm no expert on QUIC or the technical merits of your proposal, but I doubt the effectiveness of the strategy you employed in that email in getting anything other than the response that was forthcoming.

Apropos of my recent response to a question from Jay over in the other thread - prodding others until they are triggered to annoyance and pointing at their responses to say "look, I've found badness" is a fine art for sure.

Keith asked for citation - I dug it up because I wanted to see the context too - so here's the link:

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/e7ChoIKSopdnn4NcXwOAalTcdIY/

Everyone can make their own judgement.  Myself, I don't come out of that thread persuaded to become an evangelist for your approach.

Regards,

Bron.
--
  Bron Gondwana, CEO, Fastmail Pty Ltd
  brong@fastmailteam.com