IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: archives (was The other parts of the report....

sob@harvard.edu (scott bradner) Sat, 11 September 2004 21:14 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA11079; Sat, 11 Sep 2004 17:14:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C6FHL-0007qR-Vm; Sat, 11 Sep 2004 17:19:28 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C6F6d-0007q1-W3; Sat, 11 Sep 2004 17:08:24 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C6F0m-0006Vx-DC for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Sat, 11 Sep 2004 17:02:20 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA10269 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Sep 2004 17:02:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from newdev.eecs.harvard.edu ([140.247.60.212] helo=newdev.harvard.edu) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C6F57-0007ZY-3X for ietf@ietf.org; Sat, 11 Sep 2004 17:06:50 -0400
Received: by newdev.harvard.edu (Postfix, from userid 501) id EC60A89558; Sat, 11 Sep 2004 17:01:43 -0400 (EDT)
To: ietf@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20040911210143.EC60A89558@newdev.harvard.edu>
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 17:01:43 -0400
From: sob@harvard.edu
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: de4f315c9369b71d7dd5909b42224370
Subject: RE: archives (was The other parts of the report....
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 798b2e660f1819ae38035ac1d8d5e3ab

Christian asks:
  What about successive versions of the same draft?

yes, successive versions would be retained - that is what I refered to
in bullet 2

>       2/ move IDs from the normal ID directory to this
>          new one when they "expire," are replaced with an
                                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>          updated version, or when the document is published as a RFC
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

see Geoff's web site (URL posted earlier) for an example of
how useful old versions can be

Scott

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email