IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Update on feedback on US-based meetings, and IETF 102

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 14 April 2017 17:11 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEA77124281 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 10:11:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8LrZcosvChFA for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 10:11:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90C9B120046 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 10:11:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B041203B8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 13:36:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF027636BB for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 13:11:50 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Update on feedback on US-based meetings, and IETF 102
In-Reply-To: <D846BB0A-D2B2-424A-9166-F8D591C56EBF@consulintel.es>
References: <149204035801.15694.8437554373033456064.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <16010f27-e86b-b17d-4a13-62645e0bdc89@cs.tcd.ie> <a52be35f-df24-6581-90e6-bc2a262736ea@joelhalpern.com> <56c58cdd-1cc9-2e55-556a-2b799eb6e1cc@cs.tcd.ie> <43378975-daf3-0170-35c7-b57e03b834b2@comcast.net> <D846BB0A-D2B2-424A-9166-F8D591C56EBF@consulintel.es>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 13:11:50 -0400
Message-ID: <16097.1492189910@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/3_yWEtMmz2O7nSF7w-J4kGFamkw>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 17:11:53 -0000

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> wrote:
    >     If we cancel San Francisco, how much that is going to cost to the
    > IETF for each of two planned meetings?

And, what is the "break-even" point for attendance?
If people vote with their wallets, what is the impact?

(remember that the revenue that pays to operate the rfc-editor function is
generated as a result of having meetings)

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email