Re: [IAOC] Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Fri, 20 July 2012 17:52 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCA5011E8088; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 10:52:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.514
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.514 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.086, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ubcpFc-QzQft; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 10:52:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com (mail-wi0-f170.google.com [209.85.212.170]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7BF721F867E; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 10:52:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wibhq12 with SMTP id hq12so773276wib.1 for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 10:53:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=ut51MmnumkpjnvZvjWl9gV7t+OGEOB429NijOlkApnc=; b=Nd2OqG11XDP1AbbaejJYRcnKgiGm/0vN77teyt4IYFzp++sT7FKbx7wY5/Ox8mPaCN HqzjuYz7VRGt2J+35p4WJ1cmf90xdwePJxkNVXlhB8vlXeMng0T4iYOaCEJaFUGHQZHx 4wqyA1F60ZOaw6ruGMi5Xitu4W/oUTNXiK1wglPPvPBP7mqlcGnQrBOaeZA9lQdSYqQ/ UBQlcHJW/BkrrIctohxENWCJjIDMZTTkSQB+HPHnDln+m6wMv+btWNYRu0ACwAPcqxR1 6uWuXnIf+hiPm9Ss5iVFR/gr4JK5Cu5SMdd08gESQddyPy8uJ38HphDV20q6QLGUSswN GXrw==
Received: by 10.216.255.68 with SMTP id i46mr740877wes.35.1342806812449; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 10:53:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:9:4080:10:21e:c2ff:febb:8dfb? ([2601:9:4080:10:21e:c2ff:febb:8dfb]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g46sm16142186eep.15.2012.07.20.10.53.30 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 20 Jul 2012 10:53:31 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [IAOC] Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <FEE0CA44-A470-434A-9F25-88089411D0A6@bbn.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 10:53:27 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F47AEC1A-E11F-45C2-9371-61B4A52FBA9D@gmail.com>
References: <20120720130733.14364.19024.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <A29A24B6-4A07-46CC-902B-8A181F0541A3@kumari.net> <9B2F2766-DB92-4B7B-88DC-1B90FF6707B7@bbn.com> <CAPv4CP-zy1uUqXfXqNH9R1C-NTe+11pxgJ5ceZaR1=oU2E1T=A@mail.gmail.com> <A4AF7C0C-B8FB-47CB-BF36-78F2686FA5E1@harvard.edu> <1657B5B7-4680-4E32-991F-10BC70A84347@bbn.com> <50097FAE.9060805@dcrocker.net> <FEE0CA44-A470-434A-9F25-88089411D0A6@bbn.com>
To: "Richard L. Barnes" <rbarnes@bbn.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: wgchairs@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, iaoc@ietf.org, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, iab@iab.org, dcrocker@bbiw.net
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 17:52:37 -0000

Richard,

On Jul 20, 2012, at 9:40 AM, Richard L. Barnes wrote:

> 
> On Jul 20, 2012, at 11:56 AM, Dave Crocker wrote:
> 
>> On 7/20/2012 7:25 AM, Richard L. Barnes wrote:
>>> We have the technology.  Surely a CMS signed object (or even just an HTTPS download) would provide adequate authentication that it came from the IETF.  And it doesn't seem like we would have a problem providing authenticated documents to the world.
>> 
>> 
>> Do you know that these are acceptable to most/all courts?
>> 
>> d/
> 
> 
> IANAL, so no.  But what else are we going to provide that's better?
> 

We are doing things like signing internet-drafts and RFCs to make this possible, but it will be a long while before the courts catch up.  They are not exactly early adopters of things like this :-)

Bob