RE: Last Call: Modern Global Standards Paradigm

"Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)" <nurit.sprecher@nsn.com> Sat, 11 August 2012 17:53 UTC

Return-Path: <nurit.sprecher@nsn.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9832321F848A; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 10:53:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.46
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.46 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.139, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WZyLZaHpmzJ5; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 10:53:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (demumfd001.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.32]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBAA121F846C; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 10:53:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.56]) by demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id q7BHrOwI002262 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 11 Aug 2012 19:53:27 +0200
Received: from demuexc022.nsn-intra.net (demuexc022.nsn-intra.net [10.150.128.35]) by demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id q7BHrLip028357; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 19:53:24 +0200
Received: from DEMUEXC013.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.128.24]) by demuexc022.nsn-intra.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sat, 11 Aug 2012 19:53:22 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: Last Call: Modern Global Standards Paradigm
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 19:51:10 +0200
Message-ID: <E4873516F3FC7547BCFE792C7D94039C0236BA57@DEMUEXC013.nsn-intra.net>
In-Reply-To: <06a601cd7740$6fb704d0$4f250e70$@olddog.co.uk>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Last Call: Modern Global Standards Paradigm
Thread-Index: AQKADG0ZlSPzGQd8wC2Lw99G+a7b45XuZvoAgAFTzgA=
References: <DF4B6630-8BD1-4BFF-B872-99619B06FCF2@ietf.org> <06a601cd7740$6fb704d0$4f250e70$@olddog.co.uk>
From: "Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)" <nurit.sprecher@nsn.com>
To: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, "IETF" <ietf@ietf.org>, "IAB" <iab@iab.org>, "IETF-Announce" <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Aug 2012 17:53:22.0272 (UTC) FILETIME=[32D89600:01CD77EA]
X-purgate-type: clean
X-purgate-Ad: Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de
X-purgate: clean
X-purgate: This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information)
X-purgate-size: 2352
X-purgate-ID: 151667::1344707607-00006F5F-9E4C8756/0-0/0-0
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 17:53:32 -0000

I support the IETF and IAB chairs signing the document,
Nurit

-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
ext Adrian Farrel
Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2012 12:38 AM
To: 'IETF'; 'IAB'; 'IETF-Announce'
Subject: RE: Last Call: Modern Global Standards Paradigm

Hi Russ,

I am conscious that this text needs to have the consensus of the three
groups
planning to co-sign, and we also need consensus of the IETF community
that you
sign it.

Given the first of these, I think the question you ask is "Are there
strong
objections?" not "Could we wordsmith this so we would be happier with
it?"

Had you asked the second question, I would have been first in line
(actually, I
already sent my thoughts a couple of weeks ago). But I agree there is no
scope
for that at this stage.

Since you asked the other question: No, I have no strong objection, and
I
support this statement being signed by you and the IAB chair.

Thanks,
Adrian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-announce-
> bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of IETF Chair
> Sent: 10 August 2012 16:20
> To: IETF-Announce
> Cc: IAB; IETF
> Subject: Last Call: Modern Global Standards Paradigm
> 
> 
> The IETF Chair and the IAB Chair intend to sign the Affirmation
> of the Modern Global Standards Paradigm, which can be found
> here:
> 
>
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/84/slides/slides-84-iesg-opsplenary-15.p
df
> 
> An earlier version was discussed in plenary, and the IAB Chair called
> for comments on the IETF mail list.  This version includes changes
> that address those comments.
> 
> Th IETF 84 Administrative plenary minutes have been posted, so that
> discussion can be reviewed if desired.  The minutes are here:
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/84/minutes/minutes-84-iesg-opsplenary
> 
> On 8 August 2012, the IEEE Standards Association Board of Governors
> approved this version of the document.  The approval process is
> underway at the W3C as well.
> 
> The IETF Chair and the IAB Chair intend to sign the Affirmation in the
> next few weeks. Please send strong objections to the iab@iab.org
> and the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2012-08-24.
> 
> Thank you,
>   Russ Housley
>   IETF Chair