Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Fri, 06 September 2013 03:23 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3FFA11E8230 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 20:23:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.561
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.561 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IaQujfIgj7TT for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 20:23:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C97B021F90AC for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 20:23:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.66] (76-218-9-215.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.9.215]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r863NLVW010063 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 5 Sep 2013 20:23:24 -0700
Message-ID: <52294A9B.6020708@dcrocker.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 20:23:07 -0700
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
Subject: Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
References: <5F053C0B-4678-4680-A8BF-62FF282ADDCE@softarmor.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1309051743130.47262@hiroshima.bogus.com> <52293197.1060809@gmail.com> <5C7FECAB-8A22-4AF1-B023-456458E1B288@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <5C7FECAB-8A22-4AF1-B023-456458E1B288@nominum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.66]); Thu, 05 Sep 2013 20:23:25 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com>, "ietf@ietf.org Discussion" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 03:23:31 -0000

On 9/5/2013 8:08 PM, Ted Lemon wrote:
>   they convinced us we'd won

We've done quite a sales job on ourselves, also.

Remember the IAB tech plenary that declared protocols dead, because the 
client is downloaded from the server?  Think about that, in the light of 
recent revelations about compromised service providers.

That is, contrast it with truly distributed and independent clients, 
where the protocol defines a controlled and publicly vetted interface 
between the client and the server.  The former makes the client a 
semantic slave to the server.  The latter makes clients semantically 
independent and easily able to layer things on top of the services 
provided by the server.  Such things as, ummm, encryption.

Clients downloaded from the server, during a session, are extremely 
convenient.  But they can represent an interesting violation of the 
end-to-end "principle", by placing too much into the infrastructure.

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net