RE: Last Call: Modern Global Standards Paradigm

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Fri, 10 August 2012 21:38 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF3CC21F8648; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 14:38:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.484
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.484 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.115, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tC8twUBjEV2p; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 14:38:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (asmtp2.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.249]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDC1721F8646; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 14:38:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q7ALcCfb017052; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 22:38:12 +0100
Received: from 950129200 (dsl-sp-81-140-15-32.in-addr.broadbandscope.com [81.140.15.32]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q7ALcAEl017044 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 10 Aug 2012 22:38:11 +0100
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: "'IETF'" <ietf@ietf.org>, "'IAB'" <iab@iab.org>, "'IETF-Announce'" <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
References: <DF4B6630-8BD1-4BFF-B872-99619B06FCF2@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <DF4B6630-8BD1-4BFF-B872-99619B06FCF2@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Last Call: Modern Global Standards Paradigm
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 22:38:08 +0100
Message-ID: <06a601cd7740$6fb704d0$4f250e70$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQKADG0ZlSPzGQd8wC2Lw99G+a7b45XuZvoA
Content-Language: en-gb
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 21:38:15 -0000

Hi Russ,

I am conscious that this text needs to have the consensus of the three groups
planning to co-sign, and we also need consensus of the IETF community that you
sign it.

Given the first of these, I think the question you ask is "Are there strong
objections?" not "Could we wordsmith this so we would be happier with it?"

Had you asked the second question, I would have been first in line (actually, I
already sent my thoughts a couple of weeks ago). But I agree there is no scope
for that at this stage.

Since you asked the other question: No, I have no strong objection, and I
support this statement being signed by you and the IAB chair.

Thanks,
Adrian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-announce-
> bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of IETF Chair
> Sent: 10 August 2012 16:20
> To: IETF-Announce
> Cc: IAB; IETF
> Subject: Last Call: Modern Global Standards Paradigm
> 
> 
> The IETF Chair and the IAB Chair intend to sign the Affirmation
> of the Modern Global Standards Paradigm, which can be found
> here:
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/84/slides/slides-84-iesg-opsplenary-15.pdf
> 
> An earlier version was discussed in plenary, and the IAB Chair called
> for comments on the IETF mail list.  This version includes changes
> that address those comments.
> 
> Th IETF 84 Administrative plenary minutes have been posted, so that
> discussion can be reviewed if desired.  The minutes are here:
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/84/minutes/minutes-84-iesg-opsplenary
> 
> On 8 August 2012, the IEEE Standards Association Board of Governors
> approved this version of the document.  The approval process is
> underway at the W3C as well.
> 
> The IETF Chair and the IAB Chair intend to sign the Affirmation in the
> next few weeks. Please send strong objections to the iab@iab.org
> and the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2012-08-24.
> 
> Thank you,
>   Russ Housley
>   IETF Chair