Re: Proposal - Create a Time Centric or Digital Evidence Centric Area.

Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com> Tue, 03 June 2008 00:36 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5662D3A6A8A; Mon, 2 Jun 2008 17:36:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D503C3A69B8 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Jun 2008 17:36:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Cwd2zVl+7+Wy for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Jun 2008 17:36:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gs19.inmotionhosting.com (gs19b.inmotionhosting.com [66.117.3.189]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 570713A6B01 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Jun 2008 17:36:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [75.68.119.237] (port=60897 helo=[192.168.15.100]) by gs19.inmotionhosting.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from <eburger@standardstrack.com>) id 1K3KVa-0003Et-VO for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2008 17:36:15 -0700
Message-Id: <0B398BC9-E9A7-44C3-8D29-523BB16D3C45@standardstrack.com>
From: Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com>
To: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <4843DD86.5070505@edelweb.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v924)
Subject: Re: Proposal - Create a Time Centric or Digital Evidence Centric Area.
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 20:36:19 -0400
References: <003a01c8b843$22f59aa0$0200a8c0@tsg1> <CBB26E5C-79DE-4209-B771-EDD3397888CB@standardstrack.com> <4843DD86.5070505@edelweb.fr>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.924)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gs19.inmotionhosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - standardstrack.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

Looking at the LTANS charter, I would offer the work is already well  
underway.  Thanks for pointing that out.  I would agree, no need for a  
new work group, and especially no need for a new directorate.

Sigh - I'm just a poor APPS and RAI guy (hey - that rhymes :-)

On Jun 2, 2008, at 7:46 AM, Peter Sylvester wrote:

> What is missing that would require a new AREA.
> The security area is not appropriate?
> If 'area' actually meant working group,
> I wonder to what degrre the problem of 'digital evidence'
> is already treated in the LTANS working group.
>
>
> Eric Burger wrote:
>> The idea that time services are important and of interest sounds   
>> reasonable to me.  Given there has been no discussion on the list,  
>> I  would offer you write an informational draft referencing the  
>> various  protocols that could benefit from such consolidation.   
>> That may  generate interest, or, upon fully understanding the  
>> concept, may  generate enough explanation of why it is not a good  
>> idea.  Either way,  I would like to see some discussion, post the  
>> availability of a  thought-out roadmap.
>>
>> On May 17, 2008, at 1:26 PM, TS Glassey wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Now that there are multiple time services WG's its becoming very   
>>> clear that
>>> the driving processes for product IP transit systems which move  
>>> time  is now
>>> central to the IETF's operations.
>>>
>>> It if for that reason that I am suggesting that all of the Time   
>>> Centric
>>> Protocols be lumped together into a new Area specifically focused  
>>> on  Digital
>>> Evidence (DE).
>>>
>>> The reasons are simple, the DE scope of operations is rapidly   
>>> becoming key
>>> to many existing and emerging network use models, and its one  
>>> which  needs to
>>> be managed in cooperation with other WG's and Organizations to   
>>> insure proper
>>> adoption of IETF workproducts.
>>>
>>> Todd Glassey
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> IETF mailing list
>>> IETF@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> IETF mailing list
>> IETF@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>>
>>
>
>
> -- 
> To verify the signature, see http://edelpki.edelweb.fr/ Cela vous  
> permet de charger le certificat de l'autorité; die Liste mit  
> zurückgerufenen Zertifikaten finden Sie da auch.
>

_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf