IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: The ecosystem is moving

Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Fri, 13 May 2016 16:33 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E127F12D5D9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 May 2016 09:33:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gN8F6bupDNlx for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 May 2016 09:33:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-x22d.google.com (mail-qg0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73E1912D5C5 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 May 2016 09:33:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qg0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id w36so60406116qge.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 May 2016 09:33:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc; bh=fbvwPZ3Bkuaw3ArxVeN0TYwnk/1vCWQN/hhWRieNvyA=; b=iYRlHdHU/p64zhILj61CSyOcBqU2VkrmX4ma2xuF+jrhVJF7mBisQyn4ORH3zSpusx zOrOQncSHCvlysy9PP+6jyFcHwjgL/jRzbvMkAAYO5dKNnHByDldkVh70EnKV7Kw9i4f SrDZ3jMzVJJ+tJBZGSzkhGYNgho22eNAiuGCcJkx277ArnE0EfEPQgRmlxrBMigrHjez YFAt4H6ZP578OmKBydkad/P9wzuQXRFtlK+EeXNoechaOQzjrzYFbAng1CKpZ64rTs0n Y5zYW1ZMRfyVnx7c4DsL+cnroSdFpA6d09UsqAN7FdrfXqvdjcZSvy4vmGcWDxmThLmh CutQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=fbvwPZ3Bkuaw3ArxVeN0TYwnk/1vCWQN/hhWRieNvyA=; b=RA5h/m99mjh8r6nVAfAfv0dzHAUmsx5DhuvPyz4/DuH9KjXnrLsl1PFT1DsBA7FYgj riozK7AF8nI+KmWVyVMdR6qKCaPadNLo9ywRw5UBMfdoL3iId1nEYT7WO+3HDtjspZVj ptCKjKxWf7lt8IBEk4NjeJXVKM3RzHoZqDfGu4ymYzo3r7HhSGiMZ/Iu7Sy/jZK3Muqg PePJmogxcyWrcD3/SLTkDnrgaKTtR7nwRPj6Qv14wWaT+O3iN42zmXGjF0KkxogO3l3Z /EhoDZfgrChEw65bWMTMH/6+sCVQfsG1/aNNhyfAcTWn6LYZI98iv6aWk8O8fBahw3rE r09w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FX5pJihlFjGvxl9RyXWyTItAlCYpT9hQ+32E+CGwEE46Me9Tum3vXxm9eBo1GGluvr2rxDg/2x+LyDnHA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.146.10 with SMTP id 10mr17478806qhs.30.1463157192526; Fri, 13 May 2016 09:33:12 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: hallam@gmail.com
Received: by 10.55.25.105 with HTTP; Fri, 13 May 2016 09:33:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAKHUCzzJO+vSsjVJu59dNyRqBP72i8tXDdhfJ+maCwwES+pBHA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20160511125553.GA19250@sources.org> <CCF7702F-8D99-43B6-ABF3-968679259D89@nohats.ca> <CAKHUCzzJO+vSsjVJu59dNyRqBP72i8tXDdhfJ+maCwwES+pBHA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 12:33:12 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: rpi1pw-1d4JfDHlSUhSJ0bsJOIQ
Message-ID: <CAMm+Lwizm-5xH-f-3tD1xvM1CDKkSD0m4m4SRoDgQqzU8dg3Fw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: The ecosystem is moving
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
To: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11353aaab613dc0532bbd464"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/3kjwe3XIduknQI0D5mP5AI4u6HY>
Cc: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, "ietf@ietf.org Discussion" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 16:33:16 -0000

Moxie has never really been interested in the standards game. He just likes
doing code.

If we want this to be really open, we have to put our own proposal on the
table.

I am currently trying to do just that.


On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net> wrote:

> I scribbled a response to Moxie's blog post from the perspective of
> someone heavily involved in XMPP here:
> https://medium.com/@dwdbah/federation-privacy-and-user-experience-c158547f07f5
>
> TL;DR: He has some valid points, but his conclusions are very self-serving.
>
> On 12 May 2016 at 16:37, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:
>
>> There was always compuserv.
>>
>> And it is sad for everyone that we now have OTR, axolotl, double
>> ratcheting and "signal tm".
>>
>> Moxie started with OTR, migrated it to ECC and fragmented the encrypted
>> IM community. It seems that now he has made it worse due to IPR.
>>
>> Sad,
>>
>> Paul
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> > On May 11, 2016, at 08:55, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > A very interesting paper (I said "intesresting", I didn't say I
>> > agree!) on open networks where independant nodes with independently
>> > developed programs interoperate thanks to standards. The author claims
>> > closed and centralized systemes are better, because they allow faster
>> > evolution (he uses security as an example).
>> >
>> > Many IETF cases mentioned (XMPP, IPv6, email...)
>> >
>> > https://whispersystems.org/blog/the-ecosystem-is-moving/
>>
>>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email