Re: Friday scheduling in YVR?
Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Mon, 04 June 2012 19:40 UTC
Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 313D321F867D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 12:40:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.573
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.573 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.026, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UBl2tvWIa9nn for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 12:40:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from odin.smetech.net (mail.smetech.net [208.254.26.82]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2F5121F867C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 12:40:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [208.254.26.81]) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EBB39A471B; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 15:40:51 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smetech.net
Received: from odin.smetech.net ([208.254.26.82]) by localhost (ronin.smetech.net [208.254.26.81]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E9QbX2-yY6nQ; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 15:40:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.100] (pool-96-255-37-161.washdc.fios.verizon.net [96.255.37.161]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F4A99A470F; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 15:40:50 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Friday scheduling in YVR?
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120604191412.GH614@mail.yitter.info>
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 15:40:39 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <02BA7D9A-B1C6-4124-9B1F-8D2DE141E55F@vigilsec.com>
References: <20120604191412.GH614@mail.yitter.info>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 19:40:42 -0000
Andrew: That is the current plan, but we have not seen all of the WG requests yet, so it is subject to change. Russ On Jun 4, 2012, at 3:14 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > Dear colleagues, > > At the last meeting in Paris, the Friday sessions ended by 13:30. > > I haven't seen (but might have missed) follow-up about that trial, and > it isn't clear to me what the conclusion is about that approach. Does > anyone know? (It's time for me to buy a plane ticket, is why I'm > asking.) > > Best regards, > > A > > -- > Andrew Sullivan > ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
- Friday scheduling in YVR? Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Friday scheduling in YVR? Russ Housley