Re: Consultation on DRAFT Infrastructure and Services Vulnerability Disclosure Statement

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Wed, 05 August 2020 00:32 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDFD83A119D; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 17:32:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k94qM6fkl_km; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 17:32:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89CA23A1188; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 17:32:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1k37MC-0008Vj-5q; Wed, 05 Aug 2020 00:32:36 +0000
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 17:32:35 -0700
Message-ID: <m28seuc4po.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org>
Cc: IETF Discussion List <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Consultation on DRAFT Infrastructure and Services Vulnerability Disclosure Statement
In-Reply-To: <793241C9-C75C-407D-AD98-06E13C789154@ietf.org>
References: <159651200228.24262.1827308624474280314@ietfa.amsl.com> <m2k0yeca1a.wl-randy@psg.com> <793241C9-C75C-407D-AD98-06E13C789154@ietf.org>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-7"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/3t1v8Dt_qX1D6swrKSPhaJiWW00>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2020 00:32:39 -0000

> First, just to note that as feedback comes in, a new branch is being
> updated to address that feedback:

in what way was i not clear about "internet draft?"  i have a nightly
rsunk direceory of all drafts and have no desire for yet more browser
tabs.

> If your friend doesn’t like email then they can always add a github
> issue directly.

my friend already gave at the office.  ex ietf sec ad.  has negative
desire to see anything like an ietf mailing list again.

> I agree that it would be useful to include a time commitment but we
> are in an unusual position as a semi-professional/semi-volunteer
> organisation and it is therefore difficult for us to make commitments
> about what volunteers can do.

you seem able to make excuses quickly. :)

what you do not seem to understand that the 90 day limit is what folk
will give you.  well, the polite ones.  you can like that or not.

> It would be useful if your friend could provide details of where these
> don’t work in practice and suggested fixes.

have the security ADs and operational security folk helped with this?

randy