Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Thu, 21 October 2021 20:14 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3378B3A0A4A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 13:14:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.649
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g23XMbUjPYzj for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 13:14:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-f45.google.com (mail-ed1-f45.google.com [209.85.208.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C63A3A0A3D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 13:14:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-f45.google.com with SMTP id ec8so2723749edb.6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 13:14:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=jLuPUY8kTkiOTwMfHRrNcVZCmbMnKlh/4ZwH1PLUUEw=; b=7Ctx0XZawL9CyWP+rB11eCpwPdUe+8NODam2w+gdF/B2sT8Y8d/bxW+TdsyWK8qTHa 4asUYnHbmyrsiZpAaSLHW4rLSNI5ZWhU3Sy64YC9CcX87t1f5ClaCf8BfIPxSVRMmBgm P6pVHh41el9qOPZaOBZUPcbXd5iSP3mSi/q/g81UcUjsdxtib+TVdF/ZXUtnsCjaKXOA UXOWmybl+sezdFfxnETtyT8qD2GJpflYunAXV2yqs5QMW7A7iEWF5D6XiX/AAqbUmF4e +gJHoj/1Gp508gjFBTmi91+NrAayvDk0Fa3t5QMSuwDun81maA/q0Jb9CigOBwdNwoRK CggQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533ZnAlpbyNgg4F9BfA/alWMu8fXr94ucTjUoRVKEI8rj6BIdcap nWS9AI4LoQp5ZUZw+5wi+SvAdZdo3iUs/N1afLs10ZKEk/U=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx5JIvsHe5Vi1WCAjGxSCgJg/KohcAw7gAxBHrsA3yeuCRo6l1q8jHURKPWvkCkX9yvAo9elA2acBuWcyk6QrI=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1778:: with SMTP id da24mr10544852edb.318.1634847252977; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 13:14:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4BDF1DD9-9D30-499F-8C26-1E7790F2A729@akamai.com> <CALaySJKYG8ydGrgdSKZY1b28VL2DvwTS_3_40y_eFkHcGjdJXg@mail.gmail.com> <53A1649E-0E10-449D-9EC0-87A6FDCD07B2@gmail.com> <11EDEA4E-4301-4CB3-9529-6E4DF368789C@akamai.com> <67d01e27-8a1b-0ad8-afe0-4e9d4d8bb4d1@comcast.net> <F69E3F89-C44D-4692-8115-3B73477EEF54@akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <F69E3F89-C44D-4692-8115-3B73477EEF54@akamai.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 16:14:01 -0400
Message-ID: <CAC4RtVDZ2tXmstcC1oh5NZ8u_FZ-WAVwH-M7nvh_inWTLnkbMg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/3wtVXDJwLmOV_wLSCIPw-P_q_WA>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 20:14:20 -0000

I don't think anyone said "must not"... just that we need to allow the
possibility of no gap.

So here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-leiba-term-limit-guidance/

I have made an alternative proposal, and I'd appreciate comments on
that.  I think we can discuss both proposals together.

Barry

On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 2:34 PM Salz, Rich
<rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
> With Mike's corrections and cutting off the limit at pre-1996 because the structure changed, we get:
>
> Lars was Transport AD until 2011; 10 years.
> Aliisa was ART AD until 2017, no gap.
> Jari was Internet AD until 2012; one year.
> Russ was Security AD until 2007; no gap
> Brian Carpenter wasn't an AD unless it was before 1989 so at least a 15 year gap.
> Harald was Ops AD until 1999 so two year gap.
> Fred Baker wasn't an AD before 1989 so at least a six year gap.
>
> Or, 10 0 1 0 infinite 2 inifinite ?
>
> I don't see how you can make a compelling argument that AD->IETF Chair must not have a gap year.
>
>