Re: IPv6 traffic stats

Marc Manthey <marc@let.de> Tue, 11 November 2008 22:05 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55F133A697F; Tue, 11 Nov 2008 14:05:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92B743A697F for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Nov 2008 14:05:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.771
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.771 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, WHOIS_DMNBYPROXY=0.478]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oZA4I+1TWCTl for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Nov 2008 14:05:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay2.mail.vrmd.de (relay2.mail.vrmd.de [81.28.224.28]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A2AE3A6960 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Nov 2008 14:05:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [87.79.236.249] (helo=[192.168.1.102]) by relay2.mail.vrmd.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <marc@let.de>) id 1L01MY-0008Gh-Ca for ietf@ietf.org; Tue, 11 Nov 2008 23:05:30 +0100
Message-Id: <DDFC9E8A-007E-42EB-80C5-8DECCD1B70D8@let.de>
From: Marc Manthey <marc@let.de>
To: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <4919FA68.4030803@alvestrand.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2)
Subject: Re: IPv6 traffic stats
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 23:05:28 +0100
References: <08111108201165.2a71d.487911088@oregon.uoregon.edu> <20081111185711.GG1588@nsn.com> <4919ED2F.2020101@alvestrand.no> <f1110c510811111249ud4ee387m2169fb84378ec3f4@mail.gmail.com> <4919FA68.4030803@alvestrand.no>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2)
X-Relay-User: marc@let.de
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes"
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

Am 11.11.2008 um 22:34 schrieb Harald Alvestrand:
> 8% - only Russia, Ukraine and France have more than 0.5% IPv6.
>
> Presentation available from http://rosie.ripe.net/presentations-detail/Thursday/Plenary%2014:00/index.html 
> .

wow , i am impressed  0.76% , so russia has more overall ipv6 traffic  
then the entire .u.s.a.

Guess this  realy need to be  changed !!!

Germany is not even on the list :(

regards

marc

--  
"Imagination  is more important than Knowledge".

web : http://www.let.de
-- YES WE CAN !!!! ---
http://isobamapresident.com
PGP/GnuPG: 0x1ac02f3296b12b4d  jabber :marc@kgraff.net

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf