Re: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy
"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Fri, 20 July 2012 15:50 UTC
Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D371C21F85C2 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 08:50:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -111.137
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-111.137 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.062, BAYES_00=-2.599, HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI=-4.3, RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED=-4.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oym3qoyvrm+w for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 08:50:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC1FF21F85C6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 08:50:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 94010 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2012 15:51:38 -0000
Received: from leila.iecc.com (64.57.183.34) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 20 Jul 2012 15:51:38 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:vbr-info; s=50097e8a.xn--3zv.k1207; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=lPG4I4oXrRpfl2n275VY5BTzZxLMSkIZWpouNoOUwuw=; b=SKJMg0/ei0+8Wo7PayIOleI/tXkB6j3TiBDXvvHj+K9mbuXIq2HZeh7GD7ONl9PEmc+uZQNFyOvR9ke11LSootdUAjAhEip9bv0WPbfKH7Rbhb88CTJAMiVAQ/8YKxfgsIt8KW1dr8G2f2c6sJHaQYeZAO0VhiTfDyVsH+M/GFE=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:vbr-info; s=50097e8a.xn--3zv.k1207; olt=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=lPG4I4oXrRpfl2n275VY5BTzZxLMSkIZWpouNoOUwuw=; b=MVs+w81RH0mXynThugo+NMJMqqeJULJ7K3cHvQxJaVTq039Vfj6ayE9F0yGjZk3Tv3KVWTvI56da5Q34AQBG7Gz0sFkaM3rf+DL7q0ThliihfE3dzqiq00LqflmR5dr7xfoOTyT8bXrZGFdsrXQ9ciUvdF3n7tR2nauJbf/s+IQ=
VBR-Info: md=iecc.com; mc=all; mv=dwl.spamhaus.org
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 15:51:16 -0000
Message-ID: <20120720155116.91353.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy
In-Reply-To: <7CB6858E-9F28-4BA7-8683-3903F521C2A0@checkpoint.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 15:50:46 -0000
>>> The draft policy entitled Draft Fee Policy for Legal Requests can be found >>> at: <http://iaoc.ietf.org/policyandprocedures.html> It seems fine to me, but I would add an hourly rate for research. For requests for e-mail, do they typically provide pointers to the specific archive entries, or do they ask for all mail from A on topic B in month M? In the latter case, a suitable hourly research fee would likely persuade many lawyers to tell an associate to learn how to use grep. R's, John PS: Yes, I know it's volunteers. The revenue would go into the cookies fund.
- Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy IETF Administrative Director
- Re: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy Warren Kumari
- Re: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy Richard L. Barnes
- Re: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy Scott Brim
- Re: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy Bradner, Scott
- Re: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy Richard L. Barnes
- Re: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy John C Klensin
- Re: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy Yoav Nir
- Re: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy John Levine
- Re: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy Dave Crocker
- Re: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy Richard L. Barnes
- Re: [IAOC] Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy Bob Hinden
- Re: [IAOC] Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy Marshall Eubanks
- Re: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy Jiankang Yao
- Re: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy Andrew G. Malis
- Re: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy Leif Johansson
- RE: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [IAOC] Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [IAOC] Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy John Levine
- Re: [IAOC] Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [IAOC] Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy Carsten Bormann
- Re: [IAOC] Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy John R Levine
- Re: [IAOC] Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy John R Levine
- Re: [IAOC] Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy John R Levine
- Re: [IAOC] Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy David Morris
- RE: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy Richard Shockey
- RE: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy Richard Shockey
- Re: [IAOC] Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy Scott O Bradner
- Re: [IAOC] Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy Scott O Bradner
- Re: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy Samuel Weiler