Re: Please reject the patent-encumbered proposed standard for TLS authorization

Marshall Eubanks <tme@multicasttech.com> Fri, 13 February 2009 15:14 UTC

Return-Path: <tme@multicasttech.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FB5C3A6C1A for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:14:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.203, BAYES_00=-2.599, DEAR_SOMETHING=1.605, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f0xt1w96P2Wd for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:14:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from multicasttech.com (lennon.multicasttech.com [63.105.122.7]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38C133A694F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:14:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [63.105.122.7] (account marshall_eubanks HELO [IPv6:::1]) by multicasttech.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.8) with ESMTP-TLS id 14630792; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:13:31 -0500
Message-Id: <A6799D9A-7D36-403E-8CF8-67F39AD960AD@multicasttech.com>
From: Marshall Eubanks <tme@multicasttech.com>
To: MBR <mbr@arlsoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <499359D9.9050606@arlsoft.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Subject: Re: Please reject the patent-encumbered proposed standard for TLS authorization
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:14:45 -0500
References: <20090211225100.96F656BE56E@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <499359D9.9050606@arlsoft.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
Cc: Noel Chiappa <jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:14:41 -0000

Dear Sir;

On Feb 11, 2009, at 6:06 PM, MBR wrote:

> Dear Noel,
>
> It's unfortunate, but I know of no way to tell the difference  
> between an email address that's the main point of contact for an  
> organization and an email address that distributes to a huge mailing  
> list.  I sent email to ietf@ietf.org, naively assuming that the  
> Internet Engineering Task Force was established enough to have an  
> office somewhere with a secretary who read the emails and forwarded  
> those of interest to the appropriate people.
>

Part of the rough democracy of the IETF is that there are basically no  
filters to reaching any person in a position of responsibility. The  
IETF Chair, the IAB Chair, the IESG, the general discussion list,  
Working Group Chairs, all can be easily contacted by anyone who feels  
that they have a need to. (Of course, there are means to filter  
abusive people once they demonstrate their abuse, but there is no  
filter to the newcomer.)

> Had I known ietf@ietf.org was an email list, I wouldn't have emailed  
> the list.  However, having inadvertently done so, I hope I won't be  
> accused of repeat mailbombing for sending this explanation in  
> response to your accusation.
>
> If you'd like to suggest a way I can tell whether an email address  
> represents a single individual or an email list, I'm all ears.

In some circles, this is called due diligence. If I was requested to  
send an email about issue blah to
something@foo.org, I would try and find at least something about  
foo.org.

This could be done through a search engine, or by going to the  
appropriate web site.

In our case, the first search item I found upon entering ietf@ietf.org  
into a common engine was

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

which I think is pretty clear.

For the direct approach, right on the home page
there is a link marked "Mailing Lists," which (after the "Note Well"  
click through), takes you to a page

http://www.ietf.org/maillist-new1.html

which has a general description of the mailing lists, and a link to a  
description of the ietf@ietf.org list.

Did you try either course ? If you did, and feel that you were  
confused about appropriate processes, I for one would like to hear  
about it. Many of these web pages are quite old, and there is  
certainly room for improvement.

In my experience the IETF is very welcoming to new people and new  
points of view, but it can be hard to figure out what the pieces do in  
the beginning. If you want to continue, I would recommend that you  
start with the TAO, join
the mailing lists of interest to you, and monitor the discussion for a  
while to get a feel of the local culture.

Regards
Marshall Eubanks




>
> Mark Rosenthal
>
> Noel Chiappa wrote:
>>
>> Thank you for being part of a crowd of hundreds of people who have  
>> mailbombed
>> the mailboxes of thousands of IETF 'members' (since we don't have  
>> any formal
>> membership, just an email list). As a result, we all have such  
>> positive
>> feeling about the FSF.
>>
>> 	Noel
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf