IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Tue, 20 August 2013 07:15 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4385511E81E0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 00:15:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.428
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.428 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.129, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n7R8OMbDqXxl for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 00:14:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2179C11E81DB for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 00:14:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.66] (76-218-9-215.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.9.215]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r7K7Ejkf017729 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 20 Aug 2013 00:14:48 -0700
Message-ID: <5213174D.7080504@dcrocker.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 00:14:21 -0700
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se>
Subject: Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard
References: <20130819225810.63086.qmail@joyce.lan> <5FF26B6A-7A6C-45FE-BF93-8EB17851159D@virtualized.org> <m2siy56j0s.wl%randy@psg.com> <5212FCEF.80701@dcrocker.net> <55459829-933F-4157-893A-F90552D4441A@frobbit.se>
In-Reply-To: <55459829-933F-4157-893A-F90552D4441A@frobbit.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.66]); Tue, 20 Aug 2013 00:14:50 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: IETF Disgust <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 07:15:02 -0000

On 8/19/2013 11:33 PM, Patrik Fältström wrote:
> Reason for this is that the RR with an underscored prefix MIGHT end up in a different zone than the record without.


Patrik,

Please clarify.  I don't know what you mean by the 'with' and 'without' 
references.

And as long as I'm asking for more explanation, given the number of 
years of use the construct has had and for the number of different 
applications, where has the problem (whatever you mean specifically) 
been seen?

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email