Old Errata

Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 12 September 2016 08:29 UTC

Return-Path: <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C61B412B197 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 01:29:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3_SN4Z8m04ck for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 01:29:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22d.google.com (mail-wm0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2298D12B194 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 01:29:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id a6so41077883wmc.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 01:29:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:subject:message-id:date:to :mime-version; bh=yP7c6xO0W7uyV6BnufhsbGOQvUBk0qu3xc6oP2bAePQ=; b=DaB+CGL0KgexdKigxTmoCm5uS8zjS7xlXoYweIkMyYfHVWowD6YJQsL5x5cI6j8YYV x68yTHj6HFnjjG7jGBRC+Don0ZY2Vp3teYuZyAfPIZ/RnVPwBaUum4SsfDLp3Q9pRVtP G4bStAECN4AUuiZgnmEoSbrprqXHt57XdE/RMiDLFFCnZCIEJeZ292peXzK7Hb61eTgj gaoB+RxOkbdlHpnhQO61e/7+RxBiFsz/cgPwCMcVaPKh4uquJZiStMyCPCf6VBJ1+Xmi o/+MlFjB6Iso3kZuuA4F+To8VTgkVhyGtEic8E1WMSLi8Q8WELHg05HvV5FwP3mZcXUU 8IoQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:subject :message-id:date:to:mime-version; bh=yP7c6xO0W7uyV6BnufhsbGOQvUBk0qu3xc6oP2bAePQ=; b=ZNihwVtJmtw1tZW1JBQ9gZfFx642C425rldWbtLM/ZV5A28SHsne/UuR61Fa3kbrP1 EEzwjFsNHc4rNVVu7Ri83EiYH2QhP7P038j0Z+CX4K03TsB9Msxw3EJYQDN80asFnzAR cuVtf23MUnES9rJtClBYVlC9nvqxFSfaiS6zY1D8Oqz/Z4DC1D9mG1hPSS/TDyDymEeU xumDmF7TT/qCdV8+32j9GM1fXVphqYpYRawpz/VUw4oj7sl1S5pruKWF5c7f7L057v9t Y/elfb4oMNfFvG63/hf0HmGuI6DfDESVRQs9CdBY25SnC7IHdyPcnH3VYDqdvRLSzney 1jDg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwMYwKiaGxGmA/mBKi8ik2f+5aRLO7vSq9rJjsxZxcbJipLpbRB4gEMl3jXt88HH+A==
X-Received: by 10.28.32.15 with SMTP id g15mr7582897wmg.25.1473668959367; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 01:29:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.24.248.149] (dyn32-131.checkpoint.com. [194.29.32.131]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ub8sm16701521wjc.39.2016.09.12.01.29.18 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 12 Sep 2016 01:29:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Old Errata
Message-Id: <8536B7D1-FBE7-403F-B635-7B5794C5D8BA@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 11:29:16 +0300
To: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/46v2LK3s8mNlvoXRGxvc5N3IokM>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 08:29:23 -0000

Hi

I’ve just noticed that there are a lot (224 at this point in time) or reported errata that have not yet been handled ([1]).  Some of these are fairly recent, but a lot are from months or years ago, including 5 from 2010, 1 from 2005 (for RFC 3970 - “A Traffic Engineering (TE) MIB”)

Is there some process for getting all these errata handled?  I know the usual process is that someone submits a report, ADs or WG chairs notice, and after a brief discussion the report is classified as Verified, Held for Document Update, or Rejected. But ISTM that some reports fall through the cracks. 

And sure, I only noticed because one of those 224 is mine...

Yoav

[1] https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rec_status=2&presentation=table