Re: So, where to repeat?

SM <sm@resistor.net> Wed, 08 August 2012 19:57 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A592321F8639 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 12:57:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.57
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.57 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.029, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lS3PgN5IKSPv for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 12:57:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9470B21F861C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 12:57:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q78Jv0h4019843; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 12:57:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1344455825; bh=jmBaSrtKdhzBA4gaNm5RYuhg+gy5CTlHV1B94Zgxt30=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=a17dNc/kxeU6go8NFyemMvYzzykolC/MOCHQJdt3XZBsP44Zn8WzF/3vUaYOyRBGG JAW4MegfY0h7BroqNiSpIg0fi0fR7b5HqH9v6tWJ6qtoBJJA48Po3LSgrAKmCEEv1t uEnxCkgJPD6yDJVrZyOt5Y8Ken17JjiQUJqBnYu8=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1344455825; i=@resistor.net; bh=jmBaSrtKdhzBA4gaNm5RYuhg+gy5CTlHV1B94Zgxt30=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=oOnbQhoFDPu/IcjEgopLWr6VzDVYThSmnbifn29i1GEHph1q2uTA/RqI2R4SAK973 7Y7MEEPRTcL3H6lYhxQwo2CvYjUwhIFumsVsnyDF2DGQqzNu5j68n5M5+qeT/UEmzH hkl0hI6FCL9B+KMc/1Evc0vl/ysLNh9fOQ+1kCrk=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120808114731.0d7d2440@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 12:38:44 -0700
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Subject: Re: So, where to repeat?
In-Reply-To: <5022AD8C.4020205@stpeter.im>
References: <31BCE4DE825B3F4D9E452EFBBD3F1EF280CE839F@PACDCEXMB06.cable.comcast.com> <501EC24B.4080709@bbiw.net> <20120806120547.GA20379@crankycanuck.ca> <B5630A95D803744A81C51AD4040A6DAA234677B967@ESESSCMS0360.eemea.ericsson.se> <B31EEDDDB8ED7E4A93FDF12A4EECD30D24EBA9B1@GLKXM0002V.GREENLNK.net> <E4873516F3FC7547BCFE792C7D94039C02314C5E@DEMUEXC013.nsn-intra.net> <B31EEDDDB8ED7E4A93FDF12A4EECD30D24EBA9E4@GLKXM0002V.GREENLNK.net> <CAHBDyN5NLoJWMXEa8EdEVWxtUxm5XsuCjmqD4xn_N=2=7vKGXg@mail.gmail.com> <29F2EDD3-71B8-4762-8753-5C7AF369001B@tzi.org> <15DAC57C-82D5-4261-B0FA-4B700138DA2A@proto6.com> <79811B0A-FA21-456A-8016-BF20DF3FBD95@checkpoint.com> <5022AD8C.4020205@stpeter.im>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 19:57:10 -0000

Hi Peter,
At 11:18 08-08-2012, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>If we discussed protocols the way we discuss venue sites, all would be
>lost. "Oh, this feature works great for me, therefore let's include it
>in the spec."

That's how protocols are discussed. :-)

>Perhaps we might consider ending these interminable venue discussions
>and just complain three times a year when we visit a place that the IAOC
>has selected?

Here's a quick snapshot.

  Quebec has been in the exact same location for over 400 years.  The city
  has historic monuments which are insulting to the Americans who failed
  to capture the city in 1775. [1]

  Brand-new conference centre, canonical hotel is a Hilton, and
  boy can I show you some bars... [2]

  Nothing is "a reasonable walk" when the average temperature is 32 C.
  At least not for the "average" IETF attendee. [3]

  You'd be eligible to vote if you'd attended an IETF anytime within the past,
  say, 2 years - or if you were willing to commit to attending the one you vote
  on if it wins. [4]

  There are a host of reasons that voting is a stupid decision making 
process. I
  thought we knew that. [5]

  Now, we should maybe calibrate that in something other than USD (maybe in
  milligrams of gold, or the Economist's Bic Mac index) and also find an
  independent source on hotel price inflation. [6]

  According to the stats, since IETF-1, there have been 6 IETF meetings in
  Minneapolis.  Every one of them had significantly lower number of 
participants
  than the meeting before  and after them... except IETF-44 which was 
lower than
  IETF-43 but about the same as IETF-45, but IETF-45 was in Oslo, Norway, and
  IETF-46 went back up to higher levels again. [7]

  Maastricht Bans Cannabis Coffee-Shop Tourists [8]

  The social was held at an abbey that had wonderful dark beer in 1 
litre steins.
  I discovered that it's best to drink only one, if flying home at 
30,000 feet the
  next day. [9]

  Obviously, not enough Canadians from outside Toronto were asked.
  Everyone in the country loves to hate Toronto. [10]

Regards,
-sm

1. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg66962.html
2. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg68326.html
3. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg68330.html
4. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg68655.html
5. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg68681.html
6. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg68682.html
7. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg68729.html
8. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg69714.html
9. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg70647.html
10. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg70653.html