Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback]

Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se> Wed, 06 November 2019 21:35 UTC

Return-Path: <leifj@mnt.se>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C21312004C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 13:35:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnt-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fXdvbWjVp9cE for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 13:35:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x136.google.com (mail-lf1-x136.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 057F7120047 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 13:35:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x136.google.com with SMTP id z12so19220571lfj.9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 13:35:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnt-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=Bv3WRsUWEDihEGhxnNg6Vx7Wg6C58F245r26zCMgaHo=; b=K0XoHdmkDauXh+J0rHWB9h+FbU/nBJS0f9XVJjtSMkhLXi2cQNJmSG1QKth/8RM/kQ KUmXsz7msD9/BO6kydh8f014fbtzGcsXFe9/rahz30dVtqNejkfBIVh4LJihZCC5hswU omIajLIsF/PGdymZF+CL4MKBoZ3prDf4WC6BC8r1cYxTjIbb4L/Pn/Uz91oHFu+K6Mt4 He9CywrFrZPgsKUMgrhaKJM3DZj3Bsn2mqLJt2MDjt/ZMPb8Pyhk7QAnN6p9znMK9Rlf dbbTFh6FhBkklIWdF2U7+KxtBui0AZbE/jhs8RMCRIGK3Uby3Qh0/OKlhqnwE99tH1Ey LCeQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=Bv3WRsUWEDihEGhxnNg6Vx7Wg6C58F245r26zCMgaHo=; b=Xyw1wVSt8ynohMcpHArsgMfhWFnPrv6O9KbzCHiSwVzxIrWLqtAZ7a6T02J9OgqR3x +z8I9wA7W/vEQJbIH1QTQw62VYFmS6vGmJJ4fLJEkJUi4AlidBuZZcRyEMb9uSvyn2ZB xNGsS7gOFhxg/v5ebLzKN5b6uNHRaad9XN3ZzS4Pc54a2/i7jYnNkTkPo9/zkBt/GKHQ XClHj5SwRD0IdUGhtYIrr1ShCq1j0Qi22N7Idj0e5hgTWUOMgtkh2uvEpFJtNCjiDrca 5tKLVHT4FH7XgvrCLQR+VMbCtyzy9Z16eBeUOpMySit3oDEnMa38oBI31x3oT7AJtHHR Z/pQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVioyTAtwUwPtn9gchXDJ9qTXIfBbFL70bHm60QxG2gq75pQ5LB 4E00vematamXnSwy4WoQUr/hyZbFrIDoDg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwFIChtQZXjVobzcT7xNIJwo6xHTZMX4lNO32ky9BuxjJb3aarxPBbqazgYyW7S1EWsS5Lwtg==
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4ace:: with SMTP id m14mr7472565lfp.130.1573076136851; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 13:35:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2a00:801:427:ae20:808e:437c:815e:c70? ([2a00:801:427:ae20:808e:437c:815e:c70]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i22sm7189ljg.94.2019.11.06.13.35.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 06 Nov 2019 13:35:35 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback]
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 22:35:33 +0100
Message-Id: <8334DCDB-BFDE-41F9-87A7-C20408FF47DF@mnt.se>
References: <6D2AB0B4-136D-4569-BF3C-393F11357AA8@akamai.com>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <6D2AB0B4-136D-4569-BF3C-393F11357AA8@akamai.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17A878)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/4C0H3IMKlsKPHFzUbhbuSBCs6Is>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2019 21:35:42 -0000


Skickat från min iPhone

> 6 nov. 2019 kl. 21:42 skrev Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com>;:
> 
> 
>> 
>>>  openid foundation comes to mind
>> 
>> I wonder how many members they have?  https://openid.net/foundation/benefits-members/  Again, a serious question.
>>    Whats a member and how many does the IETF have and how is that metric related to (say) the impact of an SDO? 
> 
> Do you always answer a question with a question? :)

Did it work :-) Yes!

> 
> Comparing sizes might show some interesting things.  For example, if an SDO is dominated by three big companies and everyone else is there just to get early access and do rubber-stamping, that doesn't fit the IETF model very well.
> 

I think uptake and impact are more important metrics.

Cheers Leif