IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: RANT: posting IDs more often -- more is better -- why are we so shy?

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 02 March 2017 02:09 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 542FD12945B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 18:09:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6xvnQMWZAh9V for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 18:09:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DAB7129461 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 18:09:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::b]) by mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v2228vtJ021744; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 03:08:57 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.217.124] (p5DCCCDC2.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.204.205.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3vYbMs307gzDHKC; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 03:08:57 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Subject: Re: RANT: posting IDs more often -- more is better -- why are we so shy?
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <17514.1488420343@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 03:08:56 +0100
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 510113336.812336-abec62a4fae6f8e04af6ec2c89d177ff
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B098D021-3503-4CBF-A422-7B3A58997B81@tzi.org>
References: <14476.1488384266@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <13e5803d-c2f3-7bc8-63c8-2a8311c22fae@isi.edu> <17514.1488420343@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/4D17j75xfx8MFnPj1_KBkSejzss>
Cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 02:09:02 -0000

On 2 Mar 2017, at 03:05, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> 
> Good point, but tell me why -01 and -09 and -17 don't come out faster?

One contributing factor might be that the submission interface is a pain.

(I still don’t have a Makefile entry for that.)

Grüße, Carsten

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status