IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: What to improve? BCP-38/SAC-004 anyone?

Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> Mon, 04 January 2016 15:48 UTC

Return-Path: <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C63341A89AA for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 07:48:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kDl3MLq4hIwg for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 07:48:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22a.google.com (mail-oi0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9414D1A871C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 07:48:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id o62so251766750oif.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 07:48:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=KTqOwuuxn7oBmtLLSUXp+Iy9GvXpGkvR+btCbtnR9Zc=; b=ecaQuE+RZErmAKlcTQZpmLZXWRfGYmKAh+zkANSeQ1ZDrBkGWRPOQpa97jWGC3nlPZ QBiZQ/EoVumbkMtTBbISZw6XVAu9/tQQCAoIpwWNZDOWg3HWjSLuqVQ/2PGb6jzi0VHX W1UGz4utmbFuCx6zIq1h6GpOzNdGWMy0pgyq0lorK5nrgaezX1vs5xs25A4FvzccW1XK 68awxwJ3sd2hbfFydy+lnDOJRfYDpO/6zW3uxXO47zvS9mmyYFcuZ4s+W0ZNm/HaoO/L XhCu4wsB3xAlMGnZWR8B0CDOv+8CpCY9664Ey0nX2L04oerCfAUu/MlJ88LzQ5qMaX3j XZfg==
X-Received: by 10.202.73.67 with SMTP id w64mr58077444oia.84.1451922522811; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 07:48:42 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.76.157.161 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 07:48:28 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1DA0624A-E022-4DE8-A4B4-59213FAFC468@piuha.net>
References: <7664F94E-F7A6-4556-B1E6-2DE536A7B7FC@frobbit.se> <5684FCDB.7010009@mnt.se> <A074CA07-691E-41A7-B1D7-33F4ECBED5A9@puck.nether.net> <568579FB.6030702@gmail.com> <DE81772E-22BA-45CE-A1B8-9E1BB34C0460@puck.nether.net> <1DA0624A-E022-4DE8-A4B4-59213FAFC468@piuha.net>
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 10:48:28 -0500
Message-ID: <CAF4+nEHTPVuyq5wXqkGicjqp0A0Ts=T34rUrF_1g3myAs8JjrA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: What to improve? BCP-38/SAC-004 anyone?
To: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113da78e36b5780528840eb2"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/4EMDSJv0kE4HEwLg4ypZ2HGCN9Q>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 15:48:45 -0000

On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> wrote:

>
> ....
>
> Christian wrote:
>
> > We already design new protocols with the assumption that the source IP
> address
> > can be forged. Let's fix the old ones. And in particular, let's fix DNS
> > implementations so they cannot be used as DDOS amplifiers!
>

See draft-ietf-dnsop-cookies.

Thanks,
Donald
=============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com

...
>
> Jari
>
> [1] https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email