Re: IPv6 web server

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Mon, 14 May 2018 18:02 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2166127333 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 May 2018 11:02:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.633
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.633 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tj-VmQU-MzGu for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 May 2018 11:02:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.168.224.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A7F7127076 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 May 2018 11:02:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by oxalide-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id w4EI245K143145; Mon, 14 May 2018 20:02:04 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 0DDF2204203; Mon, 14 May 2018 20:02:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.12]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3587202341; Mon, 14 May 2018 20:02:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [132.166.84.120] ([132.166.84.120]) by muguet1-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id w4EI23P2011445; Mon, 14 May 2018 20:02:03 +0200
Subject: Re: IPv6 web server
To: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
References: <fcee1ad8-255c-5619-1945-bab24c95ca89@gmail.com> <6c352737-991e-c4c2-a104-e7ebfe548009@forfun.net> <4E469EA123CE8A23BCF57C77@PSB> <2bac0d07-df38-edd6-0c06-feeae07f4b7d@cambridgegreys.com> <183a8ccb-c950-4b67-887f-9a0e5372818b@gmail.com> <0B11E010-F9AF-458C-B71E-A294FE167FD5@huitema.net>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5a35455f-e53f-222d-c891-8ff38f584f58@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 20:02:02 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <0B11E010-F9AF-458C-B71E-A294FE167FD5@huitema.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/4Fad_O_McpgDi9eM1vism1yzroI>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 18:02:14 -0000


Le 14/05/2018 à 16:34, Christian Huitema a écrit :
> 
>> On May 14, 2018, at 7:08 AM, Alexandre Petrescu
>> <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> An IPv6 Draft on an IPv6 server is no more of a rant than a claim
>> of IPv6 full access on an IPv6 access network.
> 
> Nobody prevents you from placing a copy of an internet draft on an
> IPv6 only server. But by definition a document only becomes an
> internet draft if it is published in the internet draft repository.
> Part of the process is that it becomes widely available, and the
> authors do not control the publication process.

I want to control the publication process of what I write, in some cases.

In most cases I am very happy with the publication process of IETF.

> You can absolutely publish notes on an IPv6 only site -- the IPv6
> turtle was a well known example. But those documents are not internet
> drafts.

Is an "Internet Note" a qualified naming at IETF?    I think I heard 
"Internet Engineering Note" or something like that.  Maybe that is what 
you meant...

As for the turtle, yes.

This is the list of websites I am aware of that give better content if 
accessed on IPv6:

http://www.kame.net
http://dnslabs.nl
(humbly) http://petrescu.sandelman.ca

Alex

> 
> -- Christian Huitema
>