Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-use-case-06

worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) Thu, 28 April 2016 20:31 UTC

Return-Path: <worley@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79F4612D9E6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 13:31:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.934
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.934 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=comcast.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QlN3BpgkX93a for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 13:31:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resqmta-ch2-01v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-01v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C121912D575 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 13:31:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resomta-ch2-12v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.108]) by comcast with SMTP id vsaaaFmslfr8Tvsb0aHkw4; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 20:31:34 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1461875494; bh=Y3O99cEnRxisuJO/nSCu6JSD25KarDQWoWsHatoEcL4=; h=Received:Received:Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date: Message-ID; b=YvXkmrOrOUg684DLyHkRD4RSVXLcoa/6S5VVejBQRlIT3JJMUa3OBh+KNDh/NCbpy U+tlWkY2fcKGzO+tOqnX1bTI1DIwA3ZuxsyTiSMiYJ1Y+vAITlGZ1rdiKiORdF9yHt fsaEfxY/KRM7jeoSUkM669yT1sA+zSwibgGYyLHH40b7z8gcAtYT4OQUpQWygTwrK6 p/wn4jQy2PO/H9MP6tBK2opIqFRlxomaVQqu6Jz9lEqaQQdrAUu+9WEDn/vzAW1r3G AmvZL7GunLSmfnr02Q+9sfEUpG1WvL7LdwlQ1cMWr9OXLMs48Fjv3QKYbjKIczH1Fw p3kdCPLNxfSdw==
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com ([73.143.237.82]) by resomta-ch2-12v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id nwXZ1s00b1nMCLR01wXakW; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 20:31:34 +0000
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com (hobgoblin.ariadne.com [127.0.0.1]) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id u3SKVX5c002950; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 16:31:33 -0400
Received: (from worley@localhost) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id u3SKVWBD002947; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 16:31:32 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: hobgoblin.ariadne.com: worley set sender to worley@alum.mit.edu using -f
From: worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley)
To: gen-art@ietf.org, draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-use-case.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-use-case-06
Sender: worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley)
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 16:31:32 -0400
Message-ID: <87wpnhzd97.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/4I0Pp2f9Dd1stjnGgWxeZLO2Vuo>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 20:31:39 -0000

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by
the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

For more information, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-use-case-06
Reviewer: Dale R. Worley
Review Date: 2016-04-28
IESG Telechat date: 2016-05-05

Summary:  Ready.  Thanks for the thorough reworking of section 2,
which makes clear the way that SBFD is organized, and forms the
context within which the use cases are described.  Also, many nits
were fixed.  There are still some wording problems, but the RFC Editor
can help clean those up.

Dale