Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 26 March 2020 17:03 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1152C3A08EB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 10:03:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.888
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.888 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NU8yAJXSj6Pc for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 10:03:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79D703A087B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 10:03:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D27CF38981; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 13:01:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id F30B3DCB; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 13:03:23 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: "Salz\, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
cc: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107
In-Reply-To: <55D8F3C6-7F2A-4382-AFFD-B8A1D7C14992@akamai.com>
References: <CALaySJ+kFVXrVAkYLaO6MaPqDA29MzXhVFcxG0c6hZcBs-LqnQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVAhfFLYwzqw6Qch3BpuMvqjZPzFJ5o1iTOwR+yqH8j-Aw@mail.gmail.com> <55D8F3C6-7F2A-4382-AFFD-B8A1D7C14992@akamai.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 25.1.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 13:03:23 -0400
Message-ID: <28066.1585242203@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/4OLvjoB5xWGu0eZVroTnc63vu44>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 17:03:29 -0000

Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
    > Err on the side of including people. Discount 107 for everyone.  BUT
    > include it for those who signed bluesheets on more than one day.

I didn't understand your words, but subsequent emails make me think you are
saying:
        107 occured.
        People who signed bluesheets on more than one day attended.

I find this significantly better than pretending 107 did not happen, and I
tried to state this preference before.

(I also wish to remind that it will probably matter more for 2021 eligibility
than 2020, but we should really examine the data)

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-