IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Wed, 03 February 2016 15:47 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CF341ACE9D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 07:47:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZCpGK7S5gxdO for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 07:47:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from odin.smetech.net (x-bolt-wan.smeinc.net [209.135.219.146]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F9931ACE58 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 07:47:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [209.135.209.5]) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52D2F9A5584; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 10:47:24 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smetech.net
Received: from odin.smetech.net ([209.135.209.4]) by localhost (ronin.smeinc.net [209.135.209.5]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KN7dju8oGKNt; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 10:46:16 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [10.129.227.73] (unknown [141.161.133.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 001CB9A5579; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 10:47:23 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <56B16646.203@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 10:47:22 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <35B81379-709B-403C-B781-EE42EA6EE079@vigilsec.com>
References: <20160202182036.26498.27650.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <56B10131.7040603@gmail.com> <56B10F59.4030606@cisco.com> <56B16646.203@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/4S3o3twzIysMsJ-Abi40euYRt0I>
Cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 15:47:25 -0000

Brian:

> I think the IETF Chair slot is a different matter. Yes, the IETF Chair is
> also the IESG Chair, but I don't believe s/he is in the IAOC on behalf of
> the IESG. On the contrary, it's on behalf of the IETF. I think it's
> exactly right that the IETF Chair votes in the IAOC, because nobody
> else has the same overview, and also because I believe that any IETF Chair
> who did not closely track the IAOC's business would be irresponsible.

This document does not discuss the IETF Chair's seat at all.  A few years ago, we had a discussion about that on the ietf@ietf.org list, and the community made it clear at that time that the IETF Chair needed to have a voting seat on the IAOC.

Russ

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email