Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous

Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Fri, 16 April 2021 00:22 UTC

Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BEED3A36BD for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 17:22:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wpVX1dF7Z9z7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 17:22:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [168.150.192.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEBAF3A366F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 17:22:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.0.0.3]) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0BF8C272CC; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 17:22:39 -0700 (PDT)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
References: <20210414185927.07A6E72E4243@ary.qy> <8ae469dd-a94e-73b5-412c-7f08730fc5e2@petit-huguenin.org> <25A6DF1D-5772-4DB9-8E0B-C549157DF666@akamai.com> <CAHw9_iKcacK-gsmL9P_yBuyeGYnB44j1=TxF=VnG3Uu65JKJcQ@mail.gmail.com> <10C5497B-FCC3-45BE-B6A7-EE3A1C1D6883@akamai.com> <f02a58f3-ff79-3f3f-fc31-7aa17f7d14aa@mtcc.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 17:22:38 -0700
In-Reply-To: <f02a58f3-ff79-3f3f-fc31-7aa17f7d14aa@mtcc.com> (Michael Thomas's message of "Thu, 15 Apr 2021 16:45:32 -0700")
Message-ID: <yblfszrxelt.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/4aG0MhLPVtJvr6Qre2WwtJuXzCA>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 00:23:03 -0000

Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> writes:

> Maybe one thing that could be done is to have a set of things that
> newbies can do to participate that are likely to be taken very
> favorably. What author doesn't like somebody who's gone through your
> ID with a fine tooth comb for nits, bad grammar, unclear text, etc and
> especially from fresh eyes from the perspective of a potential
> implementer, for example. Everybody would win in that situation. Their
> naivety is a huge benefit.

As a guide(s) I've (we've) mentioned this specific helpful task to
newcomers.  However, reviewing documents is sort of "boring" task to
many I'm sure.  What I've (we've?) failed to do is also state "and by
doing this your name will be put in the acknowledgements section", which
honestly might help motivate some.  Maybe.

-- 
Wes Hardaker
USC/ISI