Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?

[Ted Faber <[e-mail]>]

On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 03:49:53PM -0700, Bill Manning wrote:
> 	so... the point i was tryig to make was/is:
> 
> 	simple queries only help if you know:
> 		) the version of software running on your caching server
> 		and
> 		) the search list defined by your "resolv.conf" 

Fair enough.   (I did include the resolv.conf in the first example, but
hadn't considered the caching server.)

And I understand how a DNS name without a dot in it can be confusing.
Even with a dot in there, DNS admins (or DHCP spoofers) can put you into
a walled garden pretty easily, though.

I'm not sure I see any great benefit to using the undotted names - the
dot really indicates the "Internet brand" pretty strongly - but it seems
to function in the environments I have easy access to.  I was primarily
responding to the fellow who doubted the practicality of the idea, not
endorsing it.

-- 
Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu/~faber           PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
Unexpected attachment on this mail? See http://www.isi.edu/~faber/FAQ.html#SIG

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf