IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-behave-lsn-requirements-07

Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> Sat, 07 July 2012 21:16 UTC

Return-Path: <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CFFB21F8638; Sat, 7 Jul 2012 14:16:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jIyPvCuZmKvJ; Sat, 7 Jul 2012 14:16:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (unknown [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000:226:55ff:fe57:14db]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1818921F8631; Sat, 7 Jul 2012 14:16:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eeepc.viagenie.ca (211.17-ppp.3menatwork.com [72.0.211.17]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 15C1140109; Sat, 7 Jul 2012 17:16:41 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4FF891B7.1080504@viagenie.ca>
Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 12:44:55 -0700
From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; OpenBSD i386; rv:9.0) Gecko/20120207 Thunderbird/9.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
Subject: Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-behave-lsn-requirements-07
References: <4FF2E47C.80104@isode.com> <2D34DBB5-543F-47A3-A649-BDDFF76A6438@netapp.com>
In-Reply-To: <2D34DBB5-543F-47A3-A649-BDDFF76A6438@netapp.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "<draft-ietf-behave-lsn-requirements.all@tools.ietf.org>" <draft-ietf-behave-lsn-requirements.all@tools.ietf.org>, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, "<gen-art@ietf.org>" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "<ietf@ietf.org>" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 21:16:30 -0000

On 07/03/12 05:51, Eggert, Lars wrote:
> On Jul 3, 2012, at 14:24, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>> I found it is to be odd to have a requirements document as a BCP, but I am sure
>> you can sort the right status out with IESG.
>
> +1
>
> I fail to see why Informational wouldn't be the better status.

I don't care much about the status and will defer to the IESG, but I 
thought Informational didn't mix well with 2119 language...

Simon
-- 
DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
NAT64/DNS64 open-source        --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server               --> http://numb.viagenie.ca

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email